You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by st...@apache.org on 2014/04/24 00:39:09 UTC
svn commit: r1589532 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
Author: stefan2
Date: Wed Apr 23 22:39:08 2014
New Revision: 1589532
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1589532
Log:
* STATUS:
vote and approve r1587968, r1585499, r1581810 group,
r1577151, r1578273 group, r1573106 group
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS?rev=1589532&r1=1589531&r2=1589532&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Wed Apr 23 22:39:08 2014
@@ -179,33 +179,6 @@ Candidate changes:
Votes:
+1: rhuijben
- * r1577151
- Make 'svn merge' honor the 'preserved-conflict-file-exts' setting.
- Justification:
- While really a behavior change that doesn't belong in a patch release
- I'm guessing nobody knew that we didn't implement this flag in this
- scenario.
- Branch:
- ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1577151
- Votes:
- +1: rhuijben, steveking
-
- * r1578273, r1578311, r1578326
- Make svn_ra_get_locks() and svn_ra_get_lock() report not locked nodes
- with a NULL svn_lock_t *, as documented.
- Justification:
- Many clients use the existence of an svn_lock_t on a node via info/status
- as a boolean to note that there is a lock. But because we didn't properly
- check the result we reported mostly empty svn_lock_t instances in more
- cases. Even on directories!
- Notes:
- A branch is needed, because the serf lock handling code was refactored and
- split to multiple files on trunk.
- Branch:
- ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1578311
- Votes:
- +1: rhuijben, philip
-
* r1579588
ra_serf: Fix 'svn unlock' interop with generic DAV clients that use timeout
Justification:
@@ -228,25 +201,6 @@ Candidate changes:
Votes:
+1: rhuijben, philip
- * r1573106, r1573209
- A more stringent test for whether the compiler accepts a given option.
- Justification:
- Makes --enable-optimize and --enable-debug work with Solaris CC.
- Votes:
- +1: philip, rhuijben
-
- * r1581810, 1584342
- Fix issue 4412, locks lost from working copy with pre-1.6.17 servers.
- Justification:
- Regression from 1.7, makes using locks hard.
- Notes:
- r1584342 is the fix, r1581810 is a test that fails with a 1.6.16 server.
- Branch:
- ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1584342
- (merge before ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1584592)
- Votes:
- +1: philip, rhuijben
-
* ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-serf-no-lock-support
Resolve regression in 'svn ls -v' against mod_dav_svn repositories that
don't implement the locks report.
@@ -275,25 +229,6 @@ Candidate changes:
Votes:
+1: rhuijben, philip
- * 1585499
- Build with apr-0.9.x.
- Justification:
- 1.8 claims 0.9 support but it doesn't work.
- Branch:
- ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-apr-0.9
- Votes:
- +1: philip, rhuijben
-
- * r1587968
- Maintain data[len]=0 invariant for svn_string_t.
- Justification:
- Code may rely on null byte being present.
- Notes:
- Triggers a read beyond allocated memory on trunk but no known
- misbehaviour on 1.8.
- Votes:
- +1: philip, rhuijben
-
* r1577739, r1577755, r1588772, r1588778
Resolve issue #4480: Mergeinfo overwritten on successive merges
Justification:
@@ -364,3 +299,69 @@ Approved changes:
need to upgrade or patch around.
Votes:
+1: breser, rhuijben, danielsh
+
+ * r1587968
+ Maintain data[len]=0 invariant for svn_string_t.
+ Justification:
+ Code may rely on null byte being present.
+ Notes:
+ Triggers a read beyond allocated memory on trunk but no known
+ misbehaviour on 1.8.
+ Votes:
+ +1: philip, rhuijben, stefan2
+
+ * 1585499
+ Build with apr-0.9.x.
+ Justification:
+ 1.8 claims 0.9 support but it doesn't work.
+ Branch:
+ ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-apr-0.9
+ Votes:
+ +1: philip, rhuijben, stefan2
+
+ * r1581810, 1584342
+ Fix issue 4412, locks lost from working copy with pre-1.6.17 servers.
+ Justification:
+ Regression from 1.7, makes using locks hard.
+ Notes:
+ r1584342 is the fix, r1581810 is a test that fails with a 1.6.16 server.
+ Branch:
+ ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1584342
+ (merge before ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1584592)
+ Votes:
+ +1: philip, rhuijben, stefan2
+
+ * r1577151
+ Make 'svn merge' honor the 'preserved-conflict-file-exts' setting.
+ Justification:
+ While really a behavior change that doesn't belong in a patch release
+ I'm guessing nobody knew that we didn't implement this flag in this
+ scenario.
+ Branch:
+ ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1577151
+ Votes:
+ +1: rhuijben, steveking, stefan2
+
+ * r1578273, r1578311, r1578326
+ Make svn_ra_get_locks() and svn_ra_get_lock() report not locked nodes
+ with a NULL svn_lock_t *, as documented.
+ Justification:
+ Many clients use the existence of an svn_lock_t on a node via info/status
+ as a boolean to note that there is a lock. But because we didn't properly
+ check the result we reported mostly empty svn_lock_t instances in more
+ cases. Even on directories!
+ Notes:
+ A branch is needed, because the serf lock handling code was refactored and
+ split to multiple files on trunk.
+ Branch:
+ ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1578311
+ Votes:
+ +1: rhuijben, philip, stefan2
+
+ * r1573106, r1573209
+ A more stringent test for whether the compiler accepts a given option.
+ Justification:
+ Makes --enable-optimize and --enable-debug work with Solaris CC.
+ Votes:
+ +1: philip, rhuijben, stefan2
+