Differences in X-Spam-Report headers?

[JR <al...@nu-designs.com>]

[ Okay trying to post this to the new list now that I've slogged through my 
backlog and figured out y'all up and moved on me.  :-P ]


Yesterday we upgraded from SA 2.55 to SA 2.63 and I've noticed a difference 
in the headers SA is adding to the messages that get flagged.

Headers from v2.55

X-Spam-Report:   This mail is probably spam.  [* Snip inclusion of original 
message]
   Content analysis details:   (5.60 points, 5 required)
   PLING_QUERY        (0.7 points)  Subject has exclamation mark and 
question mark
   J_CHICKENPOX_23    (0.6 points)  BODY: {2}Letter - punctuation - {3}Letter
   J_CHICKENPOX_39    (0.6 points)  BODY: {3}Letter - punctuation - {9}Letter
   HTML_50_60         (0.5 points)  BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
   HTML_MESSAGE       (0.1 points)  BODY: HTML included in message
   HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY (0.2 points)  BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags
   HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02 (1.9 points)  BODY: HTML has images with 0-200 bytes 
of words
   MRWIGGLY           (1.0 points)  Mr. Wiggly enhance drug spam.



Headers from v2.63:

X-Spam-Report:
	*  1.5 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO
	*  0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 50 to 56%
	*      [score: 0.5003]
	*  0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
	*  4.1 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network
	*  0.1 FVGT_TRIPWIRE_QD FVGT_TRIPWIRE_QD
	*  0.1 FVGT_TRIPWIRE_QF FVGT_TRIPWIRE_QF
	*  0.1 FVGT_TRIPWIRE_TN FVGT_TRIPWIRE_TN
	*  0.1 FVGT_TRIPWIRE_OQ FVGT_TRIPWIRE_OQ
	*  0.1 FVGT_TRIPWIRE_IQ FVGT_TRIPWIRE_IQ
	*  0.1 FVGT_TRIPWIRE_PP FVGT_TRIPWIRE_PP


I can happily do with out the 
I'm-mucking-up-your-headers-by-including-the-original-message-up-here part, 
and but the new format is uuuuuuuuuuugly! Wazzup w'dat?


--JR