[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-11525) Bucket pruning

["Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-11525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14746652#comment-14746652 ] 

Sergey Shelukhin commented on HIVE-11525:
-----------------------------------------

Code can be modeled on ListBucketPruner

> Bucket pruning
> --------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-11525
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-11525
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Logical Optimizer
>    Affects Versions: 0.13.0, 0.14.0, 0.13.1, 1.0.0, 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Maciek Kocon
>            Assignee: Takuya Fukudome
>              Labels: gsoc2015
>
> Logically and functionally bucketing and partitioning are quite similar - both provide mechanism to segregate and separate the table's data based on its content. Thanks to that significant further optimisations like [partition] PRUNING or [bucket] MAP JOIN are possible.
> The difference seems to be imposed by design where the PARTITIONing is open/explicit while BUCKETing is discrete/implicit.
> Partitioning seems to be very common if not a standard feature in all current RDBMS while BUCKETING seems to be HIVE specific only.
> In a way BUCKETING could be also called by "hashing" or simply "IMPLICIT PARTITIONING".
> Regardless of the fact that these two are recognised as two separate features available in Hive there should be nothing to prevent leveraging same existing query/join optimisations across the two.
> BUCKET pruning
> Enable partition PRUNING equivalent optimisation for queries on BUCKETED tables
> Simplest example is for queries like:
> "SELECT … FROM x WHERE colA=123123"
> to read only the relevant bucket file rather than all file-buckets that belong to a table.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)