You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2008/04/03 05:57:34 UTC
Java Service Wrapper
Something that we might need to look into.
Regards,
Alan
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Roy T. Fielding <fi...@gbiv.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:20 PM
Subject: Java Service Wrapper
To: community@apache.org
The Java Service Wrapper is being used (and sometimes redistributed) by
many of our Java projects (ActiveMQ, ServiceMix, Geronimo, OFBiz,
Tomcat).
It was formerly available under an MIT/BSD style license, as can be seen
in the 3.2.3 version at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wrapper/
More recent versions of the product are currently under dual GPLv2
and commercial licensing.
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/licenseOverview.html
And yet no mention of its license is found in our documentation.
http://activemq.apache.org/java-service-wrapper.html
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/How+to+Run+OFBiz+as+Windows+Service+with+Java+Service+Wrapper
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/wrapper.html
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyWindowsService
and the only pages we have that refer to the old version are in Geronimo
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/configuring-geronimo-as-a-windows-service.html
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/configuring-geronimo-as-a-windows-service.html
If your project is currently distributing or telling users to make use
of
the Java Service Wrapper, please be sure that we only use the old
licensed
version, that our documentation points to the old site, and that when
we do
point folks to wrapper.tanukisoftware.org (which we should do because
some
users are not allergic to GPLv2) we should also point out that the newer
versions are under different licenses (GPLv2/commercial).
....Roy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org
Re: Java Service Wrapper
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Yeah. I've checked for servicemix 4, and we use 3.2.0 which is still AL
2.0, so we're ok, but it may become a problem if we want to upgrade. I
suppose in such case, we could let the users choose to upgrade to a GPLv2
licensed version.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
> Something that we might need to look into.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Roy T. Fielding <fi...@gbiv.com>
> Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:20 PM
> Subject: Java Service Wrapper
> To: community@apache.org
>
>
> The Java Service Wrapper is being used (and sometimes redistributed) by
> many of our Java projects (ActiveMQ, ServiceMix, Geronimo, OFBiz, Tomcat).
> It was formerly available under an MIT/BSD style license, as can be seen
> in the 3.2.3 version at
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/wrapper/
>
> More recent versions of the product are currently under dual GPLv2
> and commercial licensing.
>
> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/licenseOverview.html
>
> And yet no mention of its license is found in our documentation.
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/java-service-wrapper.html
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/How+to+Run+OFBiz+as+Windows+Service+with+Java+Service+Wrapper
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/wrapper.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Efhanik/wrapper.html>
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyWindowsService
>
> and the only pages we have that refer to the old version are in Geronimo
>
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/configuring-geronimo-as-a-windows-service.html
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/configuring-geronimo-as-a-windows-service.html
>
> If your project is currently distributing or telling users to make use of
> the Java Service Wrapper, please be sure that we only use the old licensed
> version, that our documentation points to the old site, and that when we
> do
> point folks to wrapper.tanukisoftware.org (which we should do because some
> users are not allergic to GPLv2) we should also point out that the newer
> versions are under different licenses (GPLv2/commercial).
>
> ....Roy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/