You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to user@hama.apache.org by wang fangfang <ic...@gmail.com> on 2013/01/02 09:09:18 UTC

small large messages vs many small messsages

hi,
    Why HAMA  is good at processing mang small messages other than small
large messages?
     Thack you very much!

Re: small large messages vs many small messsages

Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.

Hi,

Are you talking about this result?

http://wiki.apache.org/hama/Benchmarks#Test_1_.28many_small_messages_vs._few_large_messages.29

It's hard to say that the result is an accurate analysis. According to
logP model[1], "many small messages" will be more sensitive to network
latency and kill performance.

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LogP_machine

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, wang fangfang <ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>     Why HAMA  is good at processing mang small messages other than small
> large messages?
>      Thack you very much!

-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon