You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Scott Kurz (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/06/23 18:35:47 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3882) Are there any changes in 1.x that
we still need to apply to 2.x
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053951#comment-13053951 ]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-3882:
-------------------------------------
Simon,
I know we never did the work (for binding.jms to separate request/response wireformats) in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2931
in 2.x.
Not sure how I'd argue for/against us "needing" it in 2.x... I'd say we would eventually want/need it though.
We recently realized
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3869
that we hadn't done some of Simon Nash's WSDL-gen changes in 2.x... So that's covered by this JIRA, but not sure if there are others besides the issue raised.
That's all I can think of at the moment.... though I feel there might be one lurking in the back of my mind.
> Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3882
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
> Reporter: Simon Laws
> Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
>
>
> I don't know this to be true but I'm wondering if there are still changes in 1.x that we need in 2.x.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira