You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "daishi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/05/26 21:30:45 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (CASSANDRA-136) Internal error processing get_columns_since

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

daishi resolved CASSANDRA-136.
------------------------------

       Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
    Fix Version/s: 0.3

I am no longer able to reproduce this with a fresh checkout of cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.3,
so I'm going to close this.

> Internal error processing get_columns_since
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-136
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>         Environment: Hudson build #59, accessing Cassandra via thrift/python
>            Reporter: daishi
>             Fix For: 0.3
>
>
> In a cluster configuration, I understand that data consistency/availability is on an "as things propagate" basis.
> However, I did not expect to see an actual exception thrown on a normal query using 'get_columns_since'.
> I think the correct behavior when a node is unable to obtain the requested data is to simply return less data
> (in this case maybe an empty list?).
> Client-side I saw:
> ---
> ...i/org/apache/cassandra/Cassandra.py in recv_get_columns_since(self)                                                       
>     533       x.read(self._iprot)
>     534       self._iprot.readMessageEnd()                                                                                                     
> --> 535       raise x
>     536     result = get_columns_since_result()                                                                                                
>     537     result.read(self._iprot)
>                                                                                                                                                
> TApplicationException: Internal error processing get_columns_since
> ---
> and server-side I saw:
> ---
> ERROR [pool-1-thread-1] 2009-05-05 18:04:21,781 Cassandra.java (line 1106) Internal error processing get_columns_since                         
> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Operation timed out.
>         at org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageProxy.weakReadRemote(StorageProxy.java:262)                                                     
>         at org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageProxy.readProtocol(StorageProxy.java:374)
>         at org.apache.cassandra.service.CassandraServer.readColumnFamily(CassandraServer.java:117)                                             
>         at org.apache.cassandra.service.CassandraServer.get_columns_since(CassandraServer.java:159)
>         at org.apache.cassandra.service.Cassandra$Processor$get_columns_since.process(Cassandra.java:1100)                                     
>         at org.apache.cassandra.service.Cassandra$Processor.process(Cassandra.java:860)
>         at org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadPoolServer$WorkerProcess.run(TThreadPoolServer.java:252)                                            
>         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:885)
>         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)                                                     
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> Caused by: java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Operation timed out.                                                                         
>         at org.apache.cassandra.net.AsyncResult.get(AsyncResult.java:95)
>         at org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageProxy.weakReadRemote(StorageProxy.java:258)                                                     
>         ... 9 more
> ---

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.