You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Balazs Zsoldos (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/04/25 12:10:38 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (FELIX-4844) Store configuration data in a
diff-tool friendly way
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14512374#comment-14512374 ]
Balazs Zsoldos edited comment on FELIX-4844 at 4/25/15 10:10 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~marrs] You mean I can create a configuration via the ConfigurationAdmin interface where I can specify the service.factoryPid with a pre-generated service.pid?
was (Author: balazs.zsoldos):
You mean I can create a configuration via the ConfigurationAdmin interface where I can specify the service.factoryPid with a pre-generated service.pid?
> Store configuration data in a diff-tool friendly way
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-4844
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4844
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Configuration Admin
> Reporter: Balazs Zsoldos
>
> We store our configuration with the sources in the source-code control system (git). It often happens that multiple developers work on the same project and they modify the configuration parallel. It would not be a problem if the config files were diff-tool friendly. To achieve this goal, two improvements would be necessary:
> *Store entries in alphabetically ordered list*
> In the config files, the entries should be stored sorted by ABC. It is easy to implement by overriding HashTable in the same way that LinkedHashMap overrides HashMap.
> *Store array values in multiple lines*
> At the moment a setting with two values are stored like this:
> key=["value1", "value2"]
> Instead of this, I would store it in the following format (each entry on new line):
> key=[ \
> "value1", \
> "value2" \
> ]
> *Question*
> Do you think that if I prepare a patch for this, that would be accepted?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)