Re: [lazy-consensus vote] NIP-29: Versioned Flow to Connector Migration

[Kevin Doran <kd...@apache.org>]

+1

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 4:20 PM Mark Payne <ma...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> I'd like to start a vote thread (with lazy consensus [1]) for NIP-29 [2] which aims to
> allow an existing flow / Process Group to have its state and configuration migrated to a new Connector
> when an appropriate Connector is created in order to encapsulate the flow.
>
> I'll leave this open for 3 days and if nobody objects will consider
> the NIP has been approved.
>
> The actual PR/code-change will still go through our normal RTC process.
>
> Thanks
> Mark
>
> [1] https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIP-29
>

Re: [lazy-consensus vote] NIP-29: Versioned Flow to Connector Migration

[Mark Payne <ma...@hotmail.com>]

Thanks, all. With no objections, the lazy-consensus vote passes; NIP-29 is considered approved.

Thanks
-Mark


> On May 3, 2026, at 1:20 PM, Kevin Doran <kd...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 4:20 PM Mark Payne <ma...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Team,
>> 
>> I'd like to start a vote thread (with lazy consensus [1]) for NIP-29 [2] which aims to
>> allow an existing flow / Process Group to have its state and configuration migrated to a new Connector
>> when an appropriate Connector is created in order to encapsulate the flow.
>> 
>> I'll leave this open for 3 days and if nobody objects will consider
>> the NIP has been approved.
>> 
>> The actual PR/code-change will still go through our normal RTC process.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Mark
>> 
>> [1] https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIP-29
>>