Re: [proposal] myfaces-core.jar

[Colin Chalmers <co...@xs4all.nl>]

Sean

I offered and posted some prelimenary M2 scripts a while back. Wendy 
gave some feedback but there didn't seem to be much interest from others 
:-(  Apart from that I also give sidetracked.

M2 is pretty cool but a number of plugins seem to be incomplete. I've 
now got both a version M1.0.2 & M2 working as multiprojects. I've been 
working with Maven for a while, but am no expert! However if there's 
interest in the scripts I will work on them. The layout you proposed is 
basically what I already have...

BTW very interesting to see the reports provided by Maven.

PMD seems to be OK, Checkstyle against Sun specs gives thousands of 
errors and I've seen heaps of copy paste stuff. Some work there on the 
quality front :-)

Colin

Schofield wrote:

>OK lets agree to drop core then since most don't like it ;-)
>
>I think we have enough +1's for myfaces-commons.jar.  If anyone wants
>to express a -1 for this please do so in the next few days.  For now
>we'll assume this new jar in the maven builds.
>
>I have some preliminary work done on the m2 scripts.  I wrote my own
>since nobody came forward with their efforts.  I'm borrowing ideas
>from the tobago and struts scripts.  I have to say that I'm pretty
>impressed with m2 so far.  There is more to learn but its quite nice. 
>Within the next few days I hope to have something on the *test* SVN
>server for us to experiment with.  That way everyone can start
>contributing patches and test and we can all be on the same page.
>
>I've been thinking about Manfred's idea of commons-jsf.  There might
>be some merit to that idea but I still think we should wait.  Lets
>tackle reorg, maven and a 1.1.2 release first.
>
>As for breaking up tomahawk, again I think there is some value to this
>proposal but I think we're better off putting out a 1.1.2 release with
>Maven (and reworking the website) first.  That will take enough time
>and energy.  Then I think we can turn our attention to how we
>integrate tobago and move it out of the incubator.
>
>sean
>
>
>
>On 11/30/05, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>On 11/30/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>If we split the components, we will need another prefix for
>>>myfaces-core ('ft', 'f' from the standard core and 't' from tomahawk)?
>>>I see many decisions in this thread now :-) So I also think that we
>>>should avoid the name myfaces-core.
>>>      
>>>
>>I'd suggest "tf" and "th" to parallel "f" and "h"
>>
>>It's gonna be ugly no matter how we go, though :)
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>  
>

Re: [proposal] myfaces-core.jar

[Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>]

There are some work ongoing now in the mavenization of myfaces. The
work is being done in  the test area of the SVN [1], which you can
checkout. In the wiki, there is a page [2] where we are writing the
steps done to create the new mavenized structure for myfaces in order
to reproduce it again when the prototype is finished.
Currently, the maven build is working so far (with maven 2.0.1), but
there is some work to be done, such as including the tests and
organizing the documentation sites, but it looks great so far. Now
there are some reports being created, which are cool indeed.
Checkout the myfaces with maven [1] and test it. Any feedback and
contributions are really welcome, as it seems that nobody here is a
maven (2) expert!

Regards,

Bruno

[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/myfaces/
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Maven_Reorg

2005/12/16, Colin Chalmers <co...@xs4all.nl>:
> Sean
>
> I offered and posted some prelimenary M2 scripts a while back. Wendy
> gave some feedback but there didn't seem to be much interest from others
> :-(  Apart from that I also give sidetracked.
>
> M2 is pretty cool but a number of plugins seem to be incomplete. I've
> now got both a version M1.0.2 & M2 working as multiprojects. I've been
> working with Maven for a while, but am no expert! However if there's
> interest in the scripts I will work on them. The layout you proposed is
> basically what I already have...
>
> BTW very interesting to see the reports provided by Maven.
>
> PMD seems to be OK, Checkstyle against Sun specs gives thousands of
> errors and I've seen heaps of copy paste stuff. Some work there on the
> quality front :-)
>
> Colin
>
> Schofield wrote:
>
> >OK lets agree to drop core then since most don't like it ;-)
> >
> >I think we have enough +1's for myfaces-commons.jar.  If anyone wants
> >to express a -1 for this please do so in the next few days.  For now
> >we'll assume this new jar in the maven builds.
> >
> >I have some preliminary work done on the m2 scripts.  I wrote my own
> >since nobody came forward with their efforts.  I'm borrowing ideas
> >from the tobago and struts scripts.  I have to say that I'm pretty
> >impressed with m2 so far.  There is more to learn but its quite nice.
> >Within the next few days I hope to have something on the *test* SVN
> >server for us to experiment with.  That way everyone can start
> >contributing patches and test and we can all be on the same page.
> >
> >I've been thinking about Manfred's idea of commons-jsf.  There might
> >be some merit to that idea but I still think we should wait.  Lets
> >tackle reorg, maven and a 1.1.2 release first.
> >
> >As for breaking up tomahawk, again I think there is some value to this
> >proposal but I think we're better off putting out a 1.1.2 release with
> >Maven (and reworking the website) first.  That will take enough time
> >and energy.  Then I think we can turn our attention to how we
> >integrate tobago and move it out of the incubator.
> >
> >sean
> >
> >
> >
> >On 11/30/05, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On 11/30/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>If we split the components, we will need another prefix for
> >>>myfaces-core ('ft', 'f' from the standard core and 't' from tomahawk)?
> >>>I see many decisions in this thread now :-) So I also think that we
> >>>should avoid the name myfaces-core.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I'd suggest "tf" and "th" to parallel "f" and "h"
> >>
> >>It's gonna be ugly no matter how we go, though :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>