You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ripple.apache.org by Dan Silivestru <da...@gmail.com> on 2013/01/17 17:55:59 UTC
Should we have a WiKi?
Hi All,
I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it would be
a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective and a
developer's perspective.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
--
Dan Silivestru
+1 (519) 589-3624
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Gord Tanner <gt...@gmail.com>.
+1 wiki
having doc's in the repo is nice but would require us to grant push access
for people to contribute to the discussion (which is very limiting).
We can't use github wiki's or pages just FYI :)
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I concur that it could be helpful, although (too add my two cents), I
> wonder if it should be strictly for non developer oriented content (?), or
> at all (?)..
>
> My reasoning is that, with a `doc` folder in the repository, we should be
> able to document (and host on the web, even) documentation (which includes
> guides, API docs, etc) from the repository itself (in an easy to understand
> format- MD or something else, which could be translated into HTML).
>
> Why? Well, I think maintaining a singular location for documentation (at
> least for developer oriented content) would be beneficial as it could have
> documentation in one (succinct) place. It would also (ideally) encourage
> documentation to not only be be created alongside submitted features, etc,
> but be part of the actual commits that introduced said features, etc (if
> warranted).
>
> However, I am not too sure how this could work in practise (or the setup
> and organization of the `doc` folder), and if it is something that would be
> possible as an ASF project, so a Wiki may be (traditionally) better
> (specially for people to add content easily), but, not to say it is not
> something to consider (I think). :-)
>
> For example, see: https://github.com/isaacs/npm/wiki
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Dan Silivestru
> <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it would
> be
> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective and
> a
> > developer's perspective.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Dan Silivestru
> > +1 (519) 589-3624
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Brent
>
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Definitely. It should be clear that all the apache infra that's setup for
Ripple should be targetted towards contributors/committers/developers, not
consumers.
On 1/17/13 9:16 AM, "Brent Lintner" <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I concur that it could be helpful, although (too add my two cents), I
>wonder if it should be strictly for non developer oriented content (?), or
>at all (?)..
>
>My reasoning is that, with a `doc` folder in the repository, we should be
>able to document (and host on the web, even) documentation (which includes
>guides, API docs, etc) from the repository itself (in an easy to
>understand
>format- MD or something else, which could be translated into HTML).
>
>Why? Well, I think maintaining a singular location for documentation (at
>least for developer oriented content) would be beneficial as it could have
>documentation in one (succinct) place. It would also (ideally) encourage
>documentation to not only be be created alongside submitted features, etc,
>but be part of the actual commits that introduced said features, etc (if
>warranted).
>
>However, I am not too sure how this could work in practise (or the setup
>and organization of the `doc` folder), and if it is something that would
>be
>possible as an ASF project, so a Wiki may be (traditionally) better
>(specially for people to add content easily), but, not to say it is not
>something to consider (I think). :-)
>
>For example, see: https://github.com/isaacs/npm/wiki
>
>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Dan Silivestru
><da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it would
>>be
>> a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective
>>and a
>> developer's perspective.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Dan Silivestru
>> +1 (519) 589-3624
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Brent
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>.
I concur that it could be helpful, although (too add my two cents), I
wonder if it should be strictly for non developer oriented content (?), or
at all (?)..
My reasoning is that, with a `doc` folder in the repository, we should be
able to document (and host on the web, even) documentation (which includes
guides, API docs, etc) from the repository itself (in an easy to understand
format- MD or something else, which could be translated into HTML).
Why? Well, I think maintaining a singular location for documentation (at
least for developer oriented content) would be beneficial as it could have
documentation in one (succinct) place. It would also (ideally) encourage
documentation to not only be be created alongside submitted features, etc,
but be part of the actual commits that introduced said features, etc (if
warranted).
However, I am not too sure how this could work in practise (or the setup
and organization of the `doc` folder), and if it is something that would be
possible as an ASF project, so a Wiki may be (traditionally) better
(specially for people to add content easily), but, not to say it is not
something to consider (I think). :-)
For example, see: https://github.com/isaacs/npm/wiki
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Dan Silivestru
<da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it would be
> a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective and a
> developer's perspective.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Dan Silivestru
> +1 (519) 589-3624
>
--
Brent
RE: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Ken Wallis <kw...@rim.com>.
+1
--
Ken Wallis
Product Manager – BlackBerry WebWorks
Research In Motion
(905) 629-4746 x14369
________________________________________
From: Dan Silivestru [dan.silivestru@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:55 AM
To: Ripple Dev List [ASF]
Subject: Should we have a WiKi?
Hi All,
I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it would be
a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective and a
developer's perspective.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
--
Dan Silivestru
+1 (519) 589-3624
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
Hi folks,
i have updated the issue with (hopefully) all necessary information.
Sorry for not following it accordingly. I was moving flats and with
the hectic i forgot about it.
Anyway, I asked for Dan and me being able to administer the Wiki, if
that it is necessary. My suggestion is to give every PMC member the
right for administration. If the PMC list is different after
graduation we can clean up the permission list when we move out of the
incubator.
That said, for the naming i used RIPPLE, as this seems to be the
naming scheme by all other projects too.
Cheers
Christian
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Dan Silivestru
<da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Makes sense to me... I just wasn't sure if there should be a difference
> between the "key name" and the "name" :-)
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, how about "ripple"? :P
>>
>> On 3/12/13 11:55 AM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Oops, looks like I dropped the ball on this and missed the comment from
>> >infra. I've reopened the infra issue and hopefully we can get the wiki up
>> >soon. Infra was asking what Key Name we wanted... I'm not sure I know what
>> >that means :( anyone have any ideas on this?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Dan.
>> >
>> >
>> >On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> ><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> I requested the Wiki space:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5789
>> >>
>> >> Please check the issue out from time to time as questions may raise from
>> >> Infra
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> >> <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > I will request a Confluence wiki tomorrow, assuming nobody objects
>> >>until
>> >> then
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Sounds good.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others
>> >>have
>> >> >>>any
>> >> >>>objections.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> >> >>><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Which one should we request from Infra?
>> >> >>>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
>> >> >>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
>> >> >>>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>> > Hi All,
>> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
>> >> >>>>would
>> >> >>>> be
>> >> >>>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor
>> >>perspective
>> >> >>>>and
>> >> >>>> a
>> >> >>>> > developer's perspective.
>> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>>> > Thoughts?
>> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>>> > Thanks,
>> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>>> > --
>> >> >>>> > Dan Silivestru
>> >> >>>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >> >>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>--
>> >> >>>Dan Silivestru
>> >> >>>+1 (519) 589-3624
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >> > https://www.timeandbill.de
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >> https://www.timeandbill.de
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Dan Silivestru
>> >+1 (519) 589-3624
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dan Silivestru
> +1 (519) 589-3624
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Dan Silivestru <da...@gmail.com>.
Makes sense to me... I just wasn't sure if there should be a difference
between the "key name" and the "name" :-)
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hmm, how about "ripple"? :P
>
> On 3/12/13 11:55 AM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Oops, looks like I dropped the ball on this and missed the comment from
> >infra. I've reopened the infra issue and hopefully we can get the wiki up
> >soon. Infra was asking what Key Name we wanted... I'm not sure I know what
> >that means :( anyone have any ideas on this?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Dan.
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> ><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> I requested the Wiki space:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5789
> >>
> >> Please check the issue out from time to time as questions may raise from
> >> Infra
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> >> <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I will request a Confluence wiki tomorrow, assuming nobody objects
> >>until
> >> then
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >> Sounds good.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others
> >>have
> >> >>>any
> >> >>>objections.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> >> >>><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Which one should we request from Infra?
> >> >>>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
> >> >>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
> >> >>>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> > Hi All,
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
> >> >>>>would
> >> >>>> be
> >> >>>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor
> >>perspective
> >> >>>>and
> >> >>>> a
> >> >>>> > developer's perspective.
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > Thoughts?
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > Thanks,
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > --
> >> >>>> > Dan Silivestru
> >> >>>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >> >>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>--
> >> >>>Dan Silivestru
> >> >>>+1 (519) 589-3624
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > http://www.grobmeier.de
> >> > https://www.timeandbill.de
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >> https://www.timeandbill.de
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Dan Silivestru
> >+1 (519) 589-3624
>
>
--
Dan Silivestru
+1 (519) 589-3624
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Hmm, how about "ripple"? :P
On 3/12/13 11:55 AM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Oops, looks like I dropped the ball on this and missed the comment from
>infra. I've reopened the infra issue and hopefully we can get the wiki up
>soon. Infra was asking what Key Name we wanted... I'm not sure I know what
>that means :( anyone have any ideas on this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dan.
>
>
>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier
><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I requested the Wiki space:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5789
>>
>> Please check the issue out from time to time as questions may raise from
>> Infra
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I will request a Confluence wiki tomorrow, assuming nobody objects
>>until
>> then
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >> Sounds good.
>> >>
>> >> On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others
>>have
>> >>>any
>> >>>objections.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> >>><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Which one should we request from Infra?
>> >>>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
>> >>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
>> >>>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> > Hi All,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
>> >>>>would
>> >>>> be
>> >>>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor
>>perspective
>> >>>>and
>> >>>> a
>> >>>> > developer's perspective.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Thoughts?
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Thanks,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > --
>> >>>> > Dan Silivestru
>> >>>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>--
>> >>>Dan Silivestru
>> >>>+1 (519) 589-3624
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://www.grobmeier.de
>> > https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Dan Silivestru
>+1 (519) 589-3624
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Dan Silivestru <da...@gmail.com>.
Oops, looks like I dropped the ball on this and missed the comment from
infra. I've reopened the infra issue and hopefully we can get the wiki up
soon. Infra was asking what Key Name we wanted... I'm not sure I know what
that means :( anyone have any ideas on this?
Thanks,
Dan.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I requested the Wiki space:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5789
>
> Please check the issue out from time to time as questions may raise from
> Infra
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I will request a Confluence wiki tomorrow, assuming nobody objects until
> then
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> Sounds good.
> >>
> >> On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others have
> >>>any
> >>>objections.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> >>><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
> >>>>
> >>>> Which one should we request from Infra?
> >>>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
> >>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
> >>>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > Hi All,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
> >>>>would
> >>>> be
> >>>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective
> >>>>and
> >>>> a
> >>>> > developer's perspective.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thoughts?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > Dan Silivestru
> >>>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Dan Silivestru
> >>>+1 (519) 589-3624
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.grobmeier.de
> > https://www.timeandbill.de
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
--
Dan Silivestru
+1 (519) 589-3624
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
I requested the Wiki space:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5789
Please check the issue out from time to time as questions may raise from Infra
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier
<gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will request a Confluence wiki tomorrow, assuming nobody objects until then
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Sounds good.
>>
>> On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others have
>>>any
>>>objections.
>>>
>>>
>>>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>>><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
>>>>
>>>> Which one should we request from Infra?
>>>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
>>>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >
>>>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
>>>>would
>>>> be
>>>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective
>>>>and
>>>> a
>>>> > developer's perspective.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thoughts?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Dan Silivestru
>>>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Dan Silivestru
>>>+1 (519) 589-3624
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>.
To add on, I meant to reply with a +1 (considering my previous post).
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Dan Silivestru <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> That's great, thank you.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I will request a Confluence wiki tomorrow, assuming nobody objects until
> > then
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > Sounds good.
> > >
> > > On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others have
> > >>any
> > >>objections.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> > >><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
> > >>>
> > >>> Which one should we request from Infra?
> > >>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
> > >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
> > >>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> > Hi All,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
> > >>>would
> > >>> be
> > >>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor
> perspective
> > >>>and
> > >>> a
> > >>> > developer's perspective.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thoughts?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > --
> > >>> > Dan Silivestru
> > >>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> http://www.grobmeier.de
> > >>> https://www.timeandbill.de
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>Dan Silivestru
> > >>+1 (519) 589-3624
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.grobmeier.de
> > https://www.timeandbill.de
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Silivestru
> +1 (519) 589-3624
>
--
Brent
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Dan Silivestru <da...@gmail.com>.
That's great, thank you.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I will request a Confluence wiki tomorrow, assuming nobody objects until
> then
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > Sounds good.
> >
> > On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others have
> >>any
> >>objections.
> >>
> >>
> >>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> >><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
> >>>
> >>> Which one should we request from Infra?
> >>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
> >>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi All,
> >>> >
> >>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
> >>>would
> >>> be
> >>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective
> >>>and
> >>> a
> >>> > developer's perspective.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thoughts?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Dan Silivestru
> >>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >>> https://www.timeandbill.de
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Dan Silivestru
> >>+1 (519) 589-3624
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
--
Dan Silivestru
+1 (519) 589-3624
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
I will request a Confluence wiki tomorrow, assuming nobody objects until then
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Sounds good.
>
> On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others have
>>any
>>objections.
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
>>>
>>> Which one should we request from Infra?
>>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
>>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
>>>would
>>> be
>>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective
>>>and
>>> a
>>> > developer's perspective.
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Dan Silivestru
>>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Dan Silivestru
>>+1 (519) 589-3624
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Sounds good.
On 1/20/13 10:21 PM, "Dan Silivestru" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others have
>any
>objections.
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
><gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Is this now a go for a wiki?
>>
>> Which one should we request from Infra?
>> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it
>>would
>> be
>> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective
>>and
>> a
>> > developer's perspective.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dan Silivestru
>> > +1 (519) 589-3624
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Dan Silivestru
>+1 (519) 589-3624
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Dan Silivestru <da...@gmail.com>.
Looks like it is. I would like to propose Confluence unless others have any
objections.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
<gr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Is this now a go for a wiki?
>
> Which one should we request from Infra?
> Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it would
> be
> > a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective and
> a
> > developer's perspective.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Dan Silivestru
> > +1 (519) 589-3624
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
--
Dan Silivestru
+1 (519) 589-3624
Re: Should we have a WiKi?
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
Is this now a go for a wiki?
Which one should we request from Infra?
Currently there is support for Atlassians Confluence and MoinMoin:
http://www.apache.org/dev/services.html#wikis
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Silivestru
<da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I think we should request a wiki for our project. I'm thinking it would be
> a great place to document Ripple both from a contributor perspective and a
> developer's perspective.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Dan Silivestru
> +1 (519) 589-3624
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de