You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Xavion (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/19 23:19:10 UTC

[jira] [Created] (DERBY-6842) Improve the performance of connections to soft-upgraded databases

Xavion created DERBY-6842:
-----------------------------

             Summary: Improve the performance of connections to soft-upgraded databases
                 Key: DERBY-6842
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6842
             Project: Derby
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Documentation, JDBC, SQL
    Affects Versions: 10.12.1.1
         Environment: N/A
            Reporter: Xavion
            Priority: Minor


As discovered in [Issue #6841|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6841], connections to soft-upgraded databases are significantly slower than those to their hard-upgraded counterparts.  To get an idea of just how severe the performance loss is in the former case, take a look at the results of the repetition tests run by myself (Xavion) and Rick Hillegas.

In the meantime, I noticed that there doesn't seem to be any mention in Derby's documentation about the loss of performance experienced when using soft-upgraded databases.  The only thing anyone seems to care about is the loss of functionality that one can expect when using an older database.

In fact, the ["Soft upgrade limitations"|https://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.9/devguide/tdevupgradesoft.html] article doesn't even exist anymore in Derby releases above v10.9.  Given how old (and therefore mature) Derby is, people like myself assume that its database format doesn't change much between versions.  Due to this, it'd never occur to us that soft-upgrading could be so detrimental to performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)