[GitHub] [iceberg] HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #1523: ISSUE-1520 Document writing against partitioned table in Spark

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/1523#issuecomment-699846321


   Two questions in mind on working for the PR:
   
   1) Do we want to be exhaustive on the example, like having an example dealing with all kind of transformations?
   
   I'm only dealing with `bucket` which is simpler one, and I'm not sure the information is enough for end users to deal with other transformations.
   
   2) Do we want to mention Spark JIRA issues to get rid of such requirements?
   
   If I were just an end user, I would expect Iceberg to require nothing for me. Mentioning the Spark JIRA issues would implicitly say that "We are aware of the issues and probably will work on our side, so please bear with the workaround for some time.", but if we are not wanting to be committed to work for these JIRA issues, probably also better to not mentioning these JIRA issues at all.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org