You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Mark Miller (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/07/30 23:10:15 UTC
[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1771) Using explain may double ram reqs
for fieldcaches when using ValueSourceQuery/CustomScoreQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737288#action_12737288 ]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-------------------------------------
reminder to add warning for custom queries - you shouldn't use top level reader to access fieldcache values for explain
> Using explain may double ram reqs for fieldcaches when using ValueSourceQuery/CustomScoreQuery
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1771
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org