You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2015/10/08 21:17:53 UTC
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
I just pushed a bunch of changes to the flex-asjs repo in the
Core_js_to_as branch that shows that I could replace several dozen classes
that were written in JS with AS that cross-compiles to the equivalent JS.
There are many more classes to port, but I think this is the right
direction to go for many reasons:
1) It helps prove out the whole AS to JS story
2) It will reduce errors
3) It will improve consistency between the SWF and JS versions
4) More code gets shared.
The only downside I’ve found so far is that it can get a bit ugly if the
class inheritance isn’t exactly the same (which is isn’t in a few places).
But I think the trade-off is worth it. I still have to tidy up the build
scripts a bit. Does anybody have time to pitch in on the rest of the
port? If so, I will prioritize a wiki page on what to do.
This exercise also found many bugs in Falcon. I just pushed those changes
too. And I’ve pushed those changes to the develop branch. There is no
need for a separate branch for the Falcon code required to cross-compile
this AS to JS right now (and hopefully never in the future either).
So, those Falcon changes will go out in the next release, whereas the
flex-asjs changes will wait for the next release after we complete the
port.
I would really like to get a release of Falcon and FlexJS soon. I guess I
will now try to spend some time trying to make it easier to download and
build the source packages. Separate thread on that coming up.
-Alex
On 9/18/15, 10:26 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, I’m just looking ahead and am in the mood to play in the compiler
>> code. I figure some day we’ll have a true GCL swc, either by making
>> EXTERNC more tolerant, or because a d.ts file for GCL will be converted
>>to
>> externs.
>>
>> I’m also expecting that some day as we go further into this port from JS
>> back to AS, that we’ll hit some code or write some code where we need
>>both
>> GCL.swc and JS.swc and I would expect collisions between Event and
>> EventTarget in such a case, even with the stubbed GCL.swc we currently
>> have, so I’m exploring ways to deal with that.
>
>Fair enough, would be awesome !
>
>Thanks,
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> From: aharui@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
>> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:00:51 +0000
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/18/15, 9:42 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> IMO, the externs swcs are also for developers wanting to build
>>“native”
>> >>JS
>> >> applications without the FlexJS components, so any GCL.swc needs to
>> >> support some developer using GCL and native JS. So the two swcs
>>need to
>> >> be compatible with each other. We could just hack up a GCL just to
>>get
>> >> the FlexJS JS to be written in AS but I feel like spending a day or
>>two
>> >> trying to see if there is a way we can be more general about it.
>> >
>> >Well, it would be nice if the EXTERNC could compile it all to .as but
>> >IIRC, it was far to be able to do it, the reason why I didn't consider
>>it
>> >as another extern but only as a stub with the only purpose I described
>> >before.
>> >Now, if you can compile it entirely to .as, what you're saying would
>>make
>> >more sense to me indeed but for now, only a part of the Event API has
>> >been included and for a big part, it was by hand.
>>
>> Yeah, I’m just looking ahead and am in the mood to play in the compiler
>> code. I figure some day we’ll have a true GCL swc, either by making
>> EXTERNC more tolerant, or because a d.ts file for GCL will be converted
>>to
>> externs.
>>
>> I’m also expecting that some day as we go further into this port from JS
>> back to AS, that we’ll hit some code or write some code where we need
>>both
>> GCL.swc and JS.swc and I would expect collisions between Event and
>> EventTarget in such a case, even with the stubbed GCL.swc we currently
>> have, so I’m exploring ways to deal with that.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>
RE: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Kessler CTR Mark J <ma...@usmc.mil>.
I'll take a look at it tonight.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 10:35 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
On 10/18/15, 12:39 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>What do I need to do to help with this?
Well, my understanding of the release process is that folks who intend to
vote on the release should examine the nightly build as if it were a
release candidate. I’ve posted in the discuss threads a link to scripts
that take you through the examination steps.
Once we get enough feedback that the nightly looks ok, we can open a vote
thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 10/18/15, 12:39 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>What do I need to do to help with this?
Well, my understanding of the release process is that folks who intend to
vote on the release should examine the nightly build as if it were a
release candidate. I’ve posted in the discuss threads a link to scripts
that take you through the examination steps.
Once we get enough feedback that the nightly looks ok, we can open a vote
thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
What do I need to do to help with this?
On Oct 18, 2015, at 8:40 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> I’d appreciate folks trying to find time to help us get
> 0.5.0 out the door
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:38 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> > Say I found a way to get my native calls working, I still would be ata
> loss
> > for the UI graphics framework I am currently using with Feathers. I know
> Om
> > had mentioned SVG, but I didn't hear anymore about that and I have
> really 0
> > experience with it.
> >
>
> FlexJS + SVG would be perfect for that. There I said it again :-)
> Seriously though, I have very little time to devote this feature. Right
> now, I am working on node.js support for FlexJS. After that, I hope to
> tinker with the graphics API again.
>
> More recently, one of FlexJS users Lizhi has posted Stage3D APIs ported to
> JS via FlexJS. Have you seen that?
> Here are a few links he has sent out so far:
> Code:
> https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/blob/master/src/TestGraphics.as
> Demo:
>
> http://matrix3d.github.io/assets/html5/flexjsstage3d/bin/js-release/indexg.html
>
> This library brings the Stage3D API to Canvas/JS via FlexJS.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
Yeah I am following all the threads, my point was, I managed to write a
pretty sturdy transpiler and I could probably figure out SVG, it's just the
time, just like you. :)
I'm also curious as to what Josh is tinkering with, if he is thinking about
a Feathers like framework using the transpiler. I absolutely love his
Feathers UI framework and wish it would translate to JS canvas or
something, I would totally help him with that. But I also know there are
pluses and minuses to that as well. I only know enough about JS graphics to
be called ignorant so I won't say anymore. :)
Mike
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
>
> Say I found a way to get my native calls working, I still would be ata loss
> for the UI graphics framework I am currently using with Feathers. I know Om
> had mentioned SVG, but I didn't hear anymore about that and I have really 0
> experience with it.
>
FlexJS + SVG would be perfect for that. There I said it again :-)
Seriously though, I have very little time to devote this feature. Right
now, I am working on node.js support for FlexJS. After that, I hope to
tinker with the graphics API again.
More recently, one of FlexJS users Lizhi has posted Stage3D APIs ported to
JS via FlexJS. Have you seen that?
Here are a few links he has sent out so far:
Code:
https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/blob/master/src/TestGraphics.as
Demo:
http://matrix3d.github.io/assets/html5/flexjsstage3d/bin/js-release/indexg.html
This library brings the Stage3D API to Canvas/JS via FlexJS.
Thanks,
Om
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/1/15, 2:27 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Anyway, I wish I had some projects for FlexJS/FlaconJX but my story is
> >still the same. I am using Feathers and AIR for some audio apps and it
> >requires native extensions calling C++ API so the JS part is kind of out
> >for me experimenting with those apps right now..
>
> FlexJS output is compatible with Cordova, so in theory you can use Cordova
> plug-ins to call the same C++, and MXML and AS to glue it all together.
>
Yeah, I know. :) But the thing is, I looked at Cordova and [theorized I
didn't have enough time to experiment. I'm working a day job with a friend
right now so my lab time is 0 or else now that it is .5 I would try it. All
my time atm is devoted to the Feathers apps.
I did have one app that I remember showing Om screenshots months back but
it needs to use UDP messages which last time I checked, javascript browsers
didn't support, I think maybe an android one did.
Also, the "problem" with my apps are they are more like games in a sense I
need high performance graphics/animation. You see there are to many loose
ends and questions for my stuff.
Say I found a way to get my native calls working, I still would be ata loss
for the UI graphics framework I am currently using with Feathers. I know Om
had mentioned SVG, but I didn't hear anymore about that and I have really 0
experience with it.
Anyway, I have spent more time writing this reply due to all my questions.
:)
Mike
>
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 12/1/15, 2:27 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Carlos Rovira
><carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com
>> wrote:
>
>> That sounds really amazing. So in the beginning was a mix of AS3 and
>>JS. If
>> JS didn't exit, then it was generated.
>> So, the strategy now is to have all in AS3 and *all* (or the most
>>possible)
>> JS generated?
>>
I'm pretty confident that when we're done there won't be any .JS files in
the code base.
>
>Anyway, I wish I had some projects for FlexJS/FlaconJX but my story is
>still the same. I am using Feathers and AIR for some audio apps and it
>requires native extensions calling C++ API so the JS part is kind of out
>for me experimenting with those apps right now..
FlexJS output is compatible with Cordova, so in theory you can use Cordova
plug-ins to call the same C++, and MXML and AS to glue it all together.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com
> wrote:
> That sounds really amazing. So in the beginning was a mix of AS3 and JS. If
> JS didn't exit, then it was generated.
> So, the strategy now is to have all in AS3 and *all* (or the most possible)
> JS generated?
>
>
Yeah, your right. If you red back in the archives I said I would love to
enable Peter and Alex to only have to focus on the framework and for them
not to have to write JS, I saw that as a huge minus for the project
actually taking off.
So I spent about 1.5 months writing the externs compiler(EXTERNC) and
getting it to mostly compile all of the google closure extern(hearder)
files.
I am so happy to hear that Alex and Peter have almost got done what I saw
could be a huge benefit with the tool I wrote.
Anyway, it's also nice to see FalconJX (my name for the failed FalconJS)
compiler actually seeing some runtime. I spent so much time writing the
unit tests and developing FalconJX that I got so depressed in 2013 I quit
basically. Alex must have seen some value in it because Erik and him got
the MXML emitter working during the time I had left.
Anyway, I wish I had some projects for FlexJS/FlaconJX but my story is
still the same. I am using Feathers and AIR for some audio apps and it
requires native extensions calling C++ API so the JS part is kind of out
for me experimenting with those apps right now..
Mike
> 2015-12-01 20:37 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/15, 11:13 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> Rovira"
> > <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Hi Alex, that sounds amazing.
> > >
> > >One question for me is what you refer as "externs". Could you share what
> > >this means?
> >
> > Externs are like header files for JS libraries. Michael Schmalle made it
> > possible to create a SWC like our js.swc that contains the
> > playerglobal.swc equivalent for the browser. It contains HTMLElement,
> > Document, Window, XMLHTTPRequest, etc. The source for the externs comes
> > from Google Closure Library.
> >
> > This allows us to write fully functional JS applications and frameworks
> by
> > writing them in AS, even in an IDE with code completion, and outputting
> > JS. The FlexJS 0.5.0 framework currently consists of thousands of lines
> > of JS code handwritten by Peter and I and others. We are almost done
> > rewriting those JS files in AS. The advantages are significant. The
> > compiler catches things sooner, we don't waste time forgetting to type
> > 'this.' or debugging when we do, we don't waste time typing out package
> > path names, etc. Also, the AS code for the SWF and the JS code for the
> > browser for any particular component often shared quite a bit of code and
> > now all that shared code is in one file with conditional compiles for JS
> > or SWF-specific code. In the end, I now strongly believe that AS is a
> > better language for writing JS.
> > I expect that we'll be able to create components in FlexJS much more
> > quickly this way.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
That sounds really amazing. So in the beginning was a mix of AS3 and JS. If
JS didn't exit, then it was generated.
So, the strategy now is to have all in AS3 and *all* (or the most possible)
JS generated?
2015-12-01 20:37 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
> On 12/1/15, 11:13 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex, that sounds amazing.
> >
> >One question for me is what you refer as "externs". Could you share what
> >this means?
>
> Externs are like header files for JS libraries. Michael Schmalle made it
> possible to create a SWC like our js.swc that contains the
> playerglobal.swc equivalent for the browser. It contains HTMLElement,
> Document, Window, XMLHTTPRequest, etc. The source for the externs comes
> from Google Closure Library.
>
> This allows us to write fully functional JS applications and frameworks by
> writing them in AS, even in an IDE with code completion, and outputting
> JS. The FlexJS 0.5.0 framework currently consists of thousands of lines
> of JS code handwritten by Peter and I and others. We are almost done
> rewriting those JS files in AS. The advantages are significant. The
> compiler catches things sooner, we don't waste time forgetting to type
> 'this.' or debugging when we do, we don't waste time typing out package
> path names, etc. Also, the AS code for the SWF and the JS code for the
> browser for any particular component often shared quite a bit of code and
> now all that shared code is in one file with conditional compiles for JS
> or SWF-specific code. In the end, I now strongly believe that AS is a
> better language for writing JS.
> I expect that we'll be able to create components in FlexJS much more
> quickly this way.
>
> -Alex
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 12/1/15, 11:13 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex, that sounds amazing.
>
>One question for me is what you refer as "externs". Could you share what
>this means?
Externs are like header files for JS libraries. Michael Schmalle made it
possible to create a SWC like our js.swc that contains the
playerglobal.swc equivalent for the browser. It contains HTMLElement,
Document, Window, XMLHTTPRequest, etc. The source for the externs comes
from Google Closure Library.
This allows us to write fully functional JS applications and frameworks by
writing them in AS, even in an IDE with code completion, and outputting
JS. The FlexJS 0.5.0 framework currently consists of thousands of lines
of JS code handwritten by Peter and I and others. We are almost done
rewriting those JS files in AS. The advantages are significant. The
compiler catches things sooner, we don't waste time forgetting to type
'this.' or debugging when we do, we don't waste time typing out package
path names, etc. Also, the AS code for the SWF and the JS code for the
browser for any particular component often shared quite a bit of code and
now all that shared code is in one file with conditional compiles for JS
or SWF-specific code. In the end, I now strongly believe that AS is a
better language for writing JS.
I expect that we'll be able to create components in FlexJS much more
quickly this way.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Alex, that sounds amazing.
One question for me is what you refer as "externs". Could you share what
this means?
thanks!
2015-12-01 19:53 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> FYI, FlexJSStore is mostly up and running on AS cross-compiled to JS. To
> me that proves that this workflow for writing JS in AS is truly viable.
>
> I'm going to fix the two bugs I know about and then start deleting the
> handwritten JS files.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 11/11/15, 11:45 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On 11/11/15, 11:41 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>If you search the source code for COMPILE::JS and COMPILE:AS3, you’ll see
> >>what they’ve done so far.
> >
> >This work is in the core_js_to_as branch. None of this has been merged to
> >develop.
> >
> >The time table is to:
> >
> >-Roughly back port all of the SWCs (clean compile, doesn’t matter if it
> >runs)
> >-Make sure the examples appear to run
> >-Delete all of the handwritten JS files in case they were somehow still
> >getting involved. Right now we keep them around for referencing.
> >-Make sure the examples appear to run
> >-move as/src/ to just src
> >-Make sure the examples appear to run
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: iOS build verificationerror
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Ah yes, the cryptic errors you get when your apple developer certificates
are renewed. Good, I'm glad that your problems are gone :-)
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jason Taylor <ja...@dedoose.com> wrote:
> Thanks Om, lol yeah been staring at that doc all day lol. I freaking
> hate working with apple, and the lack of transparency/verboisity on that
> error message is infuriating. Ended up going into devices and attempting
> to remove the existing devices and suddenly a new window I have never seen
> popped up along the lines of "hey you know how we said these devices have
> been active the whole time? Yeah we lied, their not, since your membership
> recently renewed we need to click these buttons to make them active, even
> though we have told you this whole time they are active."
>
> Freaking hate working with apple, but much love to the Flex Community.
> ~ JT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: omuppi1@gmail.com [mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash
> Muppirala
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 3:48 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: iOS build verificationerror
>
> I had a very similar issue in the last couple of weeks. When I switched
> to AIR 20Beta, the problems went away. Can you try that? The Apache Flex
> Installer supports AIR 20 Beta now.
>
> Also, here are some troubleshooting tips for the iOS AIR installation
> errors:
>
> http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2015/08/troubleshooting-air-installation-errors-ios-applications.html
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jason Taylor <ja...@dedoose.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys, hoping someone might shed some light on this.
> > - Using the latest release of IntelliJ Idea, Flex SDK 14.1
> targeting
> > AIR19.
> > - Created a brand new flash mobile for iOS project.
> > - Created new cert (on Mac), uploaded cert to iOS developer portal
> > - Created provisioning file for our 2 ipads and the cert for
> > development
> > - Told IntelliJ to generate a descriptor file, pasted in my app id
> > into descriptor
> > - Attempt to run on device yeilds applicationverification error.
> > - Repeated all steps for a distribution profile and certificate.
> > - Cleaned everything, redid everything using a wildcart appid "*",
> > same result
> > - Tried different SDK's - same result
> > - Redid everything again from the ground up, same result
> > - Tried adding the prefix to the app id - same result
> > - Updated iPad's to iOS 9.1 - same result.
> >
> > Anyone have a clue or willing to offer paid support, we are losing are
> > minds over here.
> > ~ JT
> >
>
RE: iOS build verificationerror
Posted by Jason Taylor <ja...@dedoose.com>.
Thanks Om, lol yeah been staring at that doc all day lol. I freaking hate working with apple, and the lack of transparency/verboisity on that error message is infuriating. Ended up going into devices and attempting to remove the existing devices and suddenly a new window I have never seen popped up along the lines of "hey you know how we said these devices have been active the whole time? Yeah we lied, their not, since your membership recently renewed we need to click these buttons to make them active, even though we have told you this whole time they are active."
Freaking hate working with apple, but much love to the Flex Community.
~ JT
-----Original Message-----
From: omuppi1@gmail.com [mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash Muppirala
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 3:48 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: iOS build verificationerror
I had a very similar issue in the last couple of weeks. When I switched to AIR 20Beta, the problems went away. Can you try that? The Apache Flex Installer supports AIR 20 Beta now.
Also, here are some troubleshooting tips for the iOS AIR installation
errors:
http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2015/08/troubleshooting-air-installation-errors-ios-applications.html
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jason Taylor <ja...@dedoose.com> wrote:
> Hey guys, hoping someone might shed some light on this.
> - Using the latest release of IntelliJ Idea, Flex SDK 14.1 targeting
> AIR19.
> - Created a brand new flash mobile for iOS project.
> - Created new cert (on Mac), uploaded cert to iOS developer portal
> - Created provisioning file for our 2 ipads and the cert for
> development
> - Told IntelliJ to generate a descriptor file, pasted in my app id
> into descriptor
> - Attempt to run on device yeilds applicationverification error.
> - Repeated all steps for a distribution profile and certificate.
> - Cleaned everything, redid everything using a wildcart appid "*",
> same result
> - Tried different SDK's - same result
> - Redid everything again from the ground up, same result
> - Tried adding the prefix to the app id - same result
> - Updated iPad's to iOS 9.1 - same result.
>
> Anyone have a clue or willing to offer paid support, we are losing are
> minds over here.
> ~ JT
>
Re: iOS build verificationerror
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I had a very similar issue in the last couple of weeks. When I switched to
AIR 20Beta, the problems went away. Can you try that? The Apache Flex
Installer supports AIR 20 Beta now.
Also, here are some troubleshooting tips for the iOS AIR installation
errors:
http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2015/08/troubleshooting-air-installation-errors-ios-applications.html
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jason Taylor <ja...@dedoose.com> wrote:
> Hey guys, hoping someone might shed some light on this.
> - Using the latest release of IntelliJ Idea, Flex SDK 14.1 targeting
> AIR19.
> - Created a brand new flash mobile for iOS project.
> - Created new cert (on Mac), uploaded cert to iOS developer portal
> - Created provisioning file for our 2 ipads and the cert for
> development
> - Told IntelliJ to generate a descriptor file, pasted in my app id
> into descriptor
> - Attempt to run on device yeilds applicationverification error.
> - Repeated all steps for a distribution profile and certificate.
> - Cleaned everything, redid everything using a wildcart appid "*",
> same result
> - Tried different SDK's - same result
> - Redid everything again from the ground up, same result
> - Tried adding the prefix to the app id - same result
> - Updated iPad's to iOS 9.1 - same result.
>
> Anyone have a clue or willing to offer paid support, we are losing are
> minds over here.
> ~ JT
>
iOS build verificationerror
Posted by Jason Taylor <ja...@dedoose.com>.
Hey guys, hoping someone might shed some light on this.
- Using the latest release of IntelliJ Idea, Flex SDK 14.1 targeting AIR19.
- Created a brand new flash mobile for iOS project.
- Created new cert (on Mac), uploaded cert to iOS developer portal
- Created provisioning file for our 2 ipads and the cert for development
- Told IntelliJ to generate a descriptor file, pasted in my app id into descriptor
- Attempt to run on device yeilds applicationverification error.
- Repeated all steps for a distribution profile and certificate.
- Cleaned everything, redid everything using a wildcart appid "*", same result
- Tried different SDK's - same result
- Redid everything again from the ground up, same result
- Tried adding the prefix to the app id - same result
- Updated iPad's to iOS 9.1 - same result.
Anyone have a clue or willing to offer paid support, we are losing are minds over here.
~ JT
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
FYI, FlexJSStore is mostly up and running on AS cross-compiled to JS. To
me that proves that this workflow for writing JS in AS is truly viable.
I'm going to fix the two bugs I know about and then start deleting the
handwritten JS files.
-Alex
On 11/11/15, 11:45 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 11/11/15, 11:41 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>If you search the source code for COMPILE::JS and COMPILE:AS3, you’ll see
>>what they’ve done so far.
>
>This work is in the core_js_to_as branch. None of this has been merged to
>develop.
>
>The time table is to:
>
>-Roughly back port all of the SWCs (clean compile, doesn’t matter if it
>runs)
>-Make sure the examples appear to run
>-Delete all of the handwritten JS files in case they were somehow still
>getting involved. Right now we keep them around for referencing.
>-Make sure the examples appear to run
>-move as/src/ to just src
>-Make sure the examples appear to run
>
>-Alex
>
>
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 11/11/15, 11:41 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>If you search the source code for COMPILE::JS and COMPILE:AS3, you’ll see
>what they’ve done so far.
This work is in the core_js_to_as branch. None of this has been merged to
develop.
The time table is to:
-Roughly back port all of the SWCs (clean compile, doesn’t matter if it
runs)
-Make sure the examples appear to run
-Delete all of the handwritten JS files in case they were somehow still
getting involved. Right now we keep them around for referencing.
-Make sure the examples appear to run
-move as/src/ to just src
-Make sure the examples appear to run
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
If you search the source code for COMPILE::JS and COMPILE:AS3, you’ll see what they’ve done so far.
On Nov 11, 2015, at 9:30 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, wow. That is fantastic. I hope to get my hands on this action soon.
> Sorry for not helping out for a while.
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/11/15, 11:04 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sorry if I missed it earlier, but what exactly does 'back port' mean?
>>
>> We are trying to write the entire FlexJS framework in ActionScript such
>> that every line of JS used in the HTML/JS/CSS version was cross-compiled.
>> This involved porting the handwritten js back to as (hence back port).
>>
>> When complete, we will essentially prove that large amounts of JS code can
>> be written in AS.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Oh, wow. That is fantastic. I hope to get my hands on this action soon.
Sorry for not helping out for a while.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/15, 11:04 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I'm sorry if I missed it earlier, but what exactly does 'back port' mean?
>
> We are trying to write the entire FlexJS framework in ActionScript such
> that every line of JS used in the HTML/JS/CSS version was cross-compiled.
> This involved porting the handwritten js back to as (hence back port).
>
> When complete, we will essentially prove that large amounts of JS code can
> be written in AS.
>
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 11/11/15, 11:04 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm sorry if I missed it earlier, but what exactly does 'back port' mean?
We are trying to write the entire FlexJS framework in ActionScript such
that every line of JS used in the HTML/JS/CSS version was cross-compiled.
This involved porting the handwritten js back to as (hence back port).
When complete, we will essentially prove that large amounts of JS code can
be written in AS.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I'm sorry if I missed it earlier, but what exactly does 'back port' mean?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Update:
>
> The following SWCs have been back ported (but are in various states of
> operability):
>
> Binding
> Collections
> Effects
> Graphics
> Charts
> Core
> DragDrop
> HTML
>
> Peter is almost done with:
> Mobile
>
> I’m starting in on
> Network
>
>
>
> These are remaining:
> Formatters
> Flat
> GoogleMaps
> HTML5
> Jquery
> CreateJS
>
> Once I finish Network I’ll have most of what I need to get FlexJSStore
> running in order to test the back port of DragDrop, and Effects.
>
>
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/30/15, 2:34 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >Update:
> >
> >I got all of the classes in HTML to cross-compile, and DataBindingExample
> >ran and seemed to work. Along the way, I found and fixed several bugs in
> >Falcon. While this back-port from JS to AS isn’t going out in the 0.5.0
> >release, the fixes to Falcon are since folks writing AS for JS would hit
> >these even for “low-level” JS apps.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
>
>
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Update:
The following SWCs have been back ported (but are in various states of
operability):
Binding
Collections
Effects
Graphics
Charts
Core
DragDrop
HTML
Peter is almost done with:
Mobile
I’m starting in on
Network
These are remaining:
Formatters
Flat
GoogleMaps
HTML5
Jquery
CreateJS
Once I finish Network I’ll have most of what I need to get FlexJSStore
running in order to test the back port of DragDrop, and Effects.
-Alex
On 10/30/15, 2:34 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>Update:
>
>I got all of the classes in HTML to cross-compile, and DataBindingExample
>ran and seemed to work. Along the way, I found and fixed several bugs in
>Falcon. While this back-port from JS to AS isn’t going out in the 0.5.0
>release, the fixes to Falcon are since folks writing AS for JS would hit
>these even for “low-level” JS apps.
>
>-Alex
>
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Update:
I got all of the classes in HTML to cross-compile, and DataBindingExample
ran and seemed to work. Along the way, I found and fixed several bugs in
Falcon. While this back-port from JS to AS isn’t going out in the 0.5.0
release, the fixes to Falcon are since folks writing AS for JS would hit
these even for “low-level” JS apps.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 10/14/15, 1:53 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>Update:
>
>I got all of the classes in Core to cross-compile. No idea if it will run
>yet, but before I go and start making it run, I think I discovered that I
>can re-organize the sources and possibly make things a bit simpler.
>
>Right now, in the Core project there is an as/src folder and an asjs/src
>folder. The asjs/src folder contains files that cross-compile without any
>conditional compilation. The compile options for the asjs/src folder
>actually reference the SWC generated from as/src prior to compiling the
>code in asjs/src. And then, the asjs/src compile generates a js/out and
>then we run the as/src compile again to package the js/out into the swc.
>
>But now, with the conditional compilation flags, I believe I can now
>collapse asjs/src into as/src and use conditional compilation in the
>CoreClasses.as file to skip cross-compiling a few swf-only classes we have
>in there.
>
>Then, if that’s true, the first step in building the Core project will be
>the cross-compile step to generate the js/out, then the second pass will
>compile the swc. And then all of our src will be in one folder which
>makes it easier to find source files.
>
>Anyway, I’m off to try to make that work. Let me know if I’ve missed
>something or if you have questions. This work will not be going in a
>release any time soon, it is happening in a branch.
It seems to work. DataBindingExample still runs. I pushed these changes,
so Core is now fully written in AS!
I’ll be porting the other SWCs soon. This work is not intended for the
0.5.0 release. I’d appreciate folks trying to find time to help us get
0.5.0 out the door, although I will say that the porting has uncovered
some interesting bugs in Falcon/FalconJX that will go out in 0.5.0 in case
some folks doing native JS from AS run into the same problem.
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Update:
I got all of the classes in Core to cross-compile. No idea if it will run
yet, but before I go and start making it run, I think I discovered that I
can re-organize the sources and possibly make things a bit simpler.
Right now, in the Core project there is an as/src folder and an asjs/src
folder. The asjs/src folder contains files that cross-compile without any
conditional compilation. The compile options for the asjs/src folder
actually reference the SWC generated from as/src prior to compiling the
code in asjs/src. And then, the asjs/src compile generates a js/out and
then we run the as/src compile again to package the js/out into the swc.
But now, with the conditional compilation flags, I believe I can now
collapse asjs/src into as/src and use conditional compilation in the
CoreClasses.as file to skip cross-compiling a few swf-only classes we have
in there.
Then, if that’s true, the first step in building the Core project will be
the cross-compile step to generate the js/out, then the second pass will
compile the swc. And then all of our src will be in one folder which
makes it easier to find source files.
Anyway, I’m off to try to make that work. Let me know if I’ve missed
something or if you have questions. This work will not be going in a
release any time soon, it is happening in a branch.
-Alex
On 10/8/15, 12:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>I just pushed a bunch of changes to the flex-asjs repo in the
>Core_js_to_as branch that shows that I could replace several dozen classes
>that were written in JS with AS that cross-compiles to the equivalent JS.
>
>There are many more classes to port, but I think this is the right
>direction to go for many reasons:
>1) It helps prove out the whole AS to JS story
>2) It will reduce errors
>3) It will improve consistency between the SWF and JS versions
>4) More code gets shared.
>
>The only downside I’ve found so far is that it can get a bit ugly if the
>class inheritance isn’t exactly the same (which is isn’t in a few places).
> But I think the trade-off is worth it. I still have to tidy up the build
>scripts a bit. Does anybody have time to pitch in on the rest of the
>port? If so, I will prioritize a wiki page on what to do.
>
>This exercise also found many bugs in Falcon. I just pushed those changes
>too. And I’ve pushed those changes to the develop branch. There is no
>need for a separate branch for the Falcon code required to cross-compile
>this AS to JS right now (and hopefully never in the future either).
>
>So, those Falcon changes will go out in the next release, whereas the
>flex-asjs changes will wait for the next release after we complete the
>port.
>
>I would really like to get a release of Falcon and FlexJS soon. I guess I
>will now try to spend some time trying to make it easier to download and
>build the source packages. Separate thread on that coming up.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/18/15, 10:26 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, I’m just looking ahead and am in the mood to play in the compiler
>>> code. I figure some day we’ll have a true GCL swc, either by making
>>> EXTERNC more tolerant, or because a d.ts file for GCL will be converted
>>>to
>>> externs.
>>>
>>> I’m also expecting that some day as we go further into this port from
>>>JS
>>> back to AS, that we’ll hit some code or write some code where we need
>>>both
>>> GCL.swc and JS.swc and I would expect collisions between Event and
>>> EventTarget in such a case, even with the stubbed GCL.swc we currently
>>> have, so I’m exploring ways to deal with that.
>>
>>Fair enough, would be awesome !
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>> From: aharui@adobe.com
>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
>>> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:00:51 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/18/15, 9:42 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> IMO, the externs swcs are also for developers wanting to build
>>>“native”
>>> >>JS
>>> >> applications without the FlexJS components, so any GCL.swc needs to
>>> >> support some developer using GCL and native JS. So the two swcs
>>>need to
>>> >> be compatible with each other. We could just hack up a GCL just to
>>>get
>>> >> the FlexJS JS to be written in AS but I feel like spending a day or
>>>two
>>> >> trying to see if there is a way we can be more general about it.
>>> >
>>> >Well, it would be nice if the EXTERNC could compile it all to .as but
>>> >IIRC, it was far to be able to do it, the reason why I didn't consider
>>>it
>>> >as another extern but only as a stub with the only purpose I described
>>> >before.
>>> >Now, if you can compile it entirely to .as, what you're saying would
>>>make
>>> >more sense to me indeed but for now, only a part of the Event API has
>>> >been included and for a big part, it was by hand.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I’m just looking ahead and am in the mood to play in the compiler
>>> code. I figure some day we’ll have a true GCL swc, either by making
>>> EXTERNC more tolerant, or because a d.ts file for GCL will be converted
>>>to
>>> externs.
>>>
>>> I’m also expecting that some day as we go further into this port from
>>>JS
>>> back to AS, that we’ll hit some code or write some code where we need
>>>both
>>> GCL.swc and JS.swc and I would expect collisions between Event and
>>> EventTarget in such a case, even with the stubbed GCL.swc we currently
>>> have, so I’m exploring ways to deal with that.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>
>