You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by rulien <li...@gmail.com> on 2008/11/03 13:42:23 UTC
Whole namespace in schema definitions under wsdl:types
We are using schema first developement. We used XFire but want to convert to
CXF.
We have on problem.
We have a method which uses objects generated from a xml schema using jaxb
public A findX (B , C)
In the namespace of this schema objects D, E and F also exists.
We use JAX-WS annotations to publish the webservice endpoints.
When we generate wsdl in XFire, only the elements in the interface (A, B, C)
shows up in wsdl:types definition
But in CXF every object (A, B, C, D, E and F) shows up in wsdl:types. Is
there something I can do to narrow this down ?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Whole-namespace-in-schema-definitions-under-wsdl%3Atypes-tp20302115p20302115.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Whole namespace in schema definitions under wsdl:types
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday 06 November 2008 4:51:16 pm rulien wrote:
> Would this mean that i can create an objectfactory to use instead of
> existing one created by xjc ?
>
I can't see why not. Take the one it generates, remove the references to the
unwanted types and make sure that's picked up. Sounds like it would work.
Dan
> dkulp wrote:
> > Most likely no, and I'm not exactly sure how XFire would have
> > accomplished this. If the objects are created from jaxb's xjc, there
> > is a ObjectFactory object that is created that would reference all the
> > objects in
> > the schema. (D, E, and F) The JAXB runtime checks for the
> > ObjectFactory for each object bound in and, if there, uses it to find
> > everything else. Thus, if A, B, and C are found, the ObjectFactory is
> > found, and thus so id D,
> > E, and F.
> >
> > Possibly if you delete the ObjectFactory, but I'm not sure what would
> > happen
> > then.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Monday 03 November 2008 7:42:52 am rulien wrote:
> >> We are using schema first developement. We used XFire but want to
> >> convert to CXF.
> >>
> >> We have one problem.
> >>
> >> We have a method which uses objects generated from a xml schema using
> >> jaxb
> >>
> >> public A findX (B , C)
> >>
> >> In the namespace of this schema objects D, E and F also exists.
> >>
> >> We use JAX-WS annotations to publish the webservice endpoints.
> >>
> >> When we generate wsdl in XFire, only the elements in the interface (A,
> >> B, C) shows up in wsdl:types definition
> >>
> >> But in CXF every object (A, B, C, D, E and F) shows up in wsdl:types. Is
> >> there something I can do to narrow this down ?
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://dankulp.com/blog
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Re: Whole namespace in schema definitions under wsdl:types
Posted by rulien <li...@gmail.com>.
Would this mean that i can create an objectfactory to use instead of existing
one created by xjc ?
dkulp wrote:
>
>
> Most likely no, and I'm not exactly sure how XFire would have accomplished
> this. If the objects are created from jaxb's xjc, there is a
> ObjectFactory object that is created that would reference all the objects
> in
> the schema. (D, E, and F) The JAXB runtime checks for the ObjectFactory
> for each object bound in and, if there, uses it to find everything else.
> Thus, if A, B, and C are found, the ObjectFactory is found, and thus so id
> D,
> E, and F.
>
> Possibly if you delete the ObjectFactory, but I'm not sure what would
> happen
> then.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Monday 03 November 2008 7:42:52 am rulien wrote:
>> We are using schema first developement. We used XFire but want to convert
>> to CXF.
>>
>> We have one problem.
>>
>> We have a method which uses objects generated from a xml schema using
>> jaxb
>>
>> public A findX (B , C)
>>
>> In the namespace of this schema objects D, E and F also exists.
>>
>> We use JAX-WS annotations to publish the webservice endpoints.
>>
>> When we generate wsdl in XFire, only the elements in the interface (A, B,
>> C) shows up in wsdl:types definition
>>
>> But in CXF every object (A, B, C, D, E and F) shows up in wsdl:types. Is
>> there something I can do to narrow this down ?
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Whole-namespace-in-schema-definitions-under-wsdl%3Atypes-tp20302115p20370429.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Whole namespace in schema definitions under wsdl:types
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Most likely no, and I'm not exactly sure how XFire would have accomplished
this. If the objects are created from jaxb's xjc, there is a
ObjectFactory object that is created that would reference all the objects in
the schema. (D, E, and F) The JAXB runtime checks for the ObjectFactory
for each object bound in and, if there, uses it to find everything else.
Thus, if A, B, and C are found, the ObjectFactory is found, and thus so id D,
E, and F.
Possibly if you delete the ObjectFactory, but I'm not sure what would happen
then.
Dan
On Monday 03 November 2008 7:42:52 am rulien wrote:
> We are using schema first developement. We used XFire but want to convert
> to CXF.
>
> We have one problem.
>
> We have a method which uses objects generated from a xml schema using jaxb
>
> public A findX (B , C)
>
> In the namespace of this schema objects D, E and F also exists.
>
> We use JAX-WS annotations to publish the webservice endpoints.
>
> When we generate wsdl in XFire, only the elements in the interface (A, B,
> C) shows up in wsdl:types definition
>
> But in CXF every object (A, B, C, D, E and F) shows up in wsdl:types. Is
> there something I can do to narrow this down ?
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Re: Whole namespace in schema definitions under wsdl:types
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
More @signs will help.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:42 AM, rulien <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We are using schema first developement. We used XFire but want to convert to
> CXF.
>
> We have one problem.
>
> We have a method which uses objects generated from a xml schema using jaxb
>
> public A findX (B , C)
>
> In the namespace of this schema objects D, E and F also exists.
>
> We use JAX-WS annotations to publish the webservice endpoints.
>
> When we generate wsdl in XFire, only the elements in the interface (A, B, C)
> shows up in wsdl:types definition
>
> But in CXF every object (A, B, C, D, E and F) shows up in wsdl:types. Is
> there something I can do to narrow this down ?
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Whole-namespace-in-schema-definitions-under-wsdl%3Atypes-tp20302115p20302115.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>