You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2011/08/26 15:31:16 UTC

I know that I'm being fussy

But shouldn't branches/2.0.5 be named branches/2.0?


Regards,
Alan

Re: I know that I'm being fussy

Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.

On 8/26/11 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> But shouldn't branches/2.0.5 be named branches/2.0?
Yes.


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com