You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by iv...@apache.org on 2014/12/19 14:40:41 UTC
svn commit: r1646716 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
Author: ivan
Date: Fri Dec 19 13:40:40 2014
New Revision: 1646716
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1646716
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
(verify_locks): Use svn_fspath__skip_ancestor() instead of
svn_dirent_is_child().
Modified:
subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c?rev=1646716&r1=1646715&r2=1646716&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c Fri Dec 19 13:40:40 2014
@@ -3223,7 +3223,7 @@ verify_locks(svn_fs_t *fs,
/* If this path has already been verified as part of a recursive
check of one of its parents, no need to do it again. */
if (last_recursed
- && svn_dirent_is_child(last_recursed->data, path, iterpool))
+ && svn_fspath__skip_ancestor(last_recursed->data, path))
continue;
/* What does it mean to succeed at lock verification for a given