You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by iv...@apache.org on 2014/12/19 14:40:41 UTC

svn commit: r1646716 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c

Author: ivan
Date: Fri Dec 19 13:40:40 2014
New Revision: 1646716

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1646716
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
  (verify_locks): Use svn_fspath__skip_ancestor() instead of 
   svn_dirent_is_child().

Modified:
    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c

Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c?rev=1646716&r1=1646715&r2=1646716&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c Fri Dec 19 13:40:40 2014
@@ -3223,7 +3223,7 @@ verify_locks(svn_fs_t *fs,
       /* If this path has already been verified as part of a recursive
          check of one of its parents, no need to do it again.  */
       if (last_recursed
-          && svn_dirent_is_child(last_recursed->data, path, iterpool))
+          && svn_fspath__skip_ancestor(last_recursed->data, path))
         continue;
 
       /* What does it mean to succeed at lock verification for a given