You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ibatis.apache.org by Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com> on 2005/01/13 15:32:36 UTC
Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])
Hi Ted,
Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. To date we've never had a 2-phase
release. We'll start that as of the next release.
As for the date, we could move any time. However we do it, we'll need
to wait about 24 hours after the last commit to allow time for SF.net
to create the nightly tarball of the repository. I'll put a tracer
file in as the last commit, to ensure that the tarball contains all of
the latest changes. When the time comes, I'll remove everyone's
access to the SF CVS repository and then start the 24 hour freeze.
Cheers,
Clinton
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:25:44 -0500, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> The quarterly board report is due.
>
> Could we set a firm date for the transfer of the CVS and SVN repositories?
>
> The day the repositories are transferred, we would be able to apply for graduation.
>
> The vote for the MyFaces graduation is pending now. It would be nice if we were next. :)
>
> -Ted.
>
> PS - Is iBATIS 2.0.9 considered a "General Availability" release?
>
> --- Original Message ---
> From: "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>
> To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:04:40 -0500
> Subject: *** QUARTERLY STATUS REPORTS ***
>
> > The Incubator's Quarterly Report is due next week. All projects
> > should e-mail a brief status report (and make sure that their
> > STATUS file is up to date) by the weekend.
> >
> > Mentors, you don't have to do the report yourself, but please do
> > make sure that it gets done. :-)
> >
> > Anyone should feel free to reply with any items that you feel are
> > going well with the Incubator, or could be improved to make the
> > Incubator work better.
> >
> > --- Noel
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Grade iBATIS 2.0.9 "General Availability"
Posted by Larry Meadors <la...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:11:45 -0500, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
> > Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. To date we've never had a 2-
> > phase release. We'll start that as of the next release.
>
> It doesn't have to two actual phases, in the "release candidate / final release" sense. It's just a matter of following up with a vote after the initial release..
>
> This isn't an official ASF release, but we might get into the habit of confirming the release grades on the list.
>
> Clinton's message already counts as a +1. If Larry and Brandon were to chime in, we could call it a done deal.
>
> As mentioned, I'm not big on voting for the sake of voting, in the fashion of Jakarta projects :), but the ASF takes release grades seriously, and we should get in the habit of holding release votes on the DEV list.
>
> Other than that, it should be business as usual for us. :)
>
> -Ted.
>
>
Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])
Posted by Larry Meadors <la...@gmail.com>.
Heheh, toss back a few cold ones and crank out some code...sounds like
my kind of Saturday night! Dude, you are a serious nerd. :-)
Larry
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:10:07 -0700, Clinton Begin
<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only thing I don't like about that is that it takes away the
> entire weekend for development. Could we freeze monday?
RE: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])
Posted by Gilles Bayon <gi...@laposte.net>.
+1
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ted Husted [mailto:husted@apache.org]
Envoyé : vendredi 14 janvier 2005 11:10
À : ibatis-dev@incubator.apache.org
Objet : Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])
OK, how about Sunday, 16 Jan 2005, at 23:59 PST, then?
After giving SourceForge a day to catch up, we could submit the repositories
on Tuesday.
-T.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:10:07 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
> The only thing I don't like about that is that it takes away the
> entire weekend for development. Could we freeze monday? Or
> perhaps the weekend is the best time for the infrastructure team to
> do the import?
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:28:17 -0500, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> WUSH.NET also does a nightly dump. It might be best if we froze
>> the subversion repository at the same time, so that they were
>> both available to infrastructure.
>>
>> I never got an answer about which one it was better to do first,
>> so we can let whoever does it decide.
>>
>> Did we want to pick a time, then? It would be helpful if we were
>> definite in the board report as to when we are moving forward.
>>
>> How about, say, Friday 14-Jan-2005 at 23:59 Pacific Standard Time?
>>
>> We'd then be able to submit it to infrastructure by Monday.
>>
>> Of course, people can still continue to work offline and then
>> synch up with the repository. We would just have to be more
>> careful about coordinating work for a few days so as to avoid
>> conflicts.
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ted,
>>>
>>> Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. To date we've never had a
>>> 2- phase release. We'll start that as of the next release.
>>>
>>> As for the date, we could move any time. However we do it,
>>> we'll need
>>> to wait about 24 hours after the last commit to allow time for
>>> SF.net
>>> to create the nightly tarball of the repository. I'll put a
>>> tracer file in as the last commit, to ensure that the tarball
>>> contains all of the latest changes. When the time comes, I'll
>>> remove everyone's access to the SF CVS repository and then
>>> start the 24 hour freeze.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Clinton
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:25:44 -0500, Ted Husted
>>> <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The quarterly board report is due.
>>>>
>>>> Could we set a firm date for the transfer of the CVS and SVN
>>>> repositories?
>>>>
>>>> The day the repositories are transferred, we would be able to
>>>> apply for graduation.
>>>>
>>>> The vote for the MyFaces graduation is pending now. It would
>>>> be nice if we were next. :)
>>>>
>>>> -Ted.
>>>>
>>>> PS - Is iBATIS 2.0.9 considered a "General Availability"
>>>> release?
>>>>
>>>> --- Original Message ---
>>>> From: "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>
>>>> To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:04:40 -0500
>>>> Subject: *** QUARTERLY STATUS REPORTS ***
>>>>
>>>>> The Incubator's Quarterly Report is due next week. All
>>>>> projects should e-mail a brief status report (and make sure
>>>>> that their STATUS file is up to date) by the weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mentors, you don't have to do the report yourself, but
>>>>> please do make sure that it gets done. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone should feel free to reply with any items that you
>>>>> feel are
>>>>> going well with the Incubator, or could be improved to make
>>>>> the Incubator work better.
>>>>>
>>>>> --- Noel
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.12 - Release Date: 14/01/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.12 - Release Date: 14/01/2005
Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
OK, how about Sunday, 16 Jan 2005, at 23:59 PST, then?
After giving SourceForge a day to catch up, we could submit the repositories on Tuesday.
-T.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:10:07 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
>�The only thing I don't like about that is that it takes away the
>�entire weekend for development. �Could we freeze monday? �Or
>�perhaps the weekend is the best time for the infrastructure team to
>�do the import?
>
>�Cheers,
>�Clinton
>
>
>�On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:28:17 -0500, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>
>�wrote:
>
>>�WUSH.NET also does a nightly dump. It might be best if we froze
>>�the subversion repository at the same time, so that they were
>>�both available to infrastructure.
>>
>>�I never got an answer about which one it was better to do first,
>>�so we can let whoever does it decide.
>>
>>�Did we want to pick a time, then? It would be helpful if we were
>>�definite in the board report as to when we are moving forward.
>>
>>�How about, say, Friday 14-Jan-2005 at 23:59 Pacific Standard Time?
>>
>>�We'd then be able to submit it to infrastructure by Monday.
>>
>>�Of course, people can still continue to work offline and then
>>�synch up with the repository. We would just have to be more
>>�careful about coordinating work for a few days so as to avoid
>>�conflicts.
>>
>>�-Ted.
>>
>>
>>�On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
>>
>>>�Hi Ted,
>>>
>>>�Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. �To date we've never had a
>>>�2- phase release. �We'll start that as of the next release.
>>>
>>>�As for the date, we could move any time. However we do it,
>>>�we'll need
>>>�to wait about 24 hours after the last commit to allow time for
>>>�SF.net
>>>�to create the nightly tarball of the repository. �I'll put a
>>>�tracer file in as the last commit, to ensure that the tarball
>>>�contains all of the latest changes. �When the time comes, I'll
>>>�remove everyone's access to the SF CVS repository and then
>>>�start the 24 hour freeze.
>>>
>>>�Cheers,
>>>�Clinton
>>>
>>>
>>>�On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:25:44 -0500, Ted Husted
>>>�<hu...@apache.org>�wrote:
>>>
>>>>�The quarterly board report is due.
>>>>
>>>>�Could we set a firm date for the transfer of the CVS and SVN
>>>>�repositories?
>>>>
>>>>�The day the repositories are transferred, we would be able to
>>>>�apply for graduation.
>>>>
>>>>�The vote for the MyFaces graduation is pending now. It would
>>>>�be nice if we were next. :)
>>>>
>>>>�-Ted.
>>>>
>>>>�PS - Is iBATIS 2.0.9 considered a "General Availability"
>>>>�release?
>>>>
>>>>�--- Original Message ---
>>>>�From: "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>
>>>>�To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>>�Cc:
>>>>�Sent: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:04:40 -0500
>>>>�Subject: *** QUARTERLY STATUS REPORTS ***
>>>>
>>>>>�The Incubator's Quarterly Report is due next week. �All
>>>>>�projects should e-mail a brief status report (and make sure
>>>>>�that their STATUS file is up to date) by the weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>>�Mentors, you don't have to do the report yourself, but
>>>>>�please do make sure that it gets done. �:-)
>>>>>
>>>>>�Anyone should feel free to reply with any items that you
>>>>>�feel are
>>>>>�going well with the Incubator, or could be improved to make
>>>>>�the Incubator work better.
>>>>>
>>>>>�--- Noel
Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])
Posted by Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com>.
The only thing I don't like about that is that it takes away the
entire weekend for development. Could we freeze monday? Or perhaps
the weekend is the best time for the infrastructure team to do the
import?
Cheers,
Clinton
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:28:17 -0500, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> WUSH.NET also does a nightly dump. It might be best if we froze the subversion repository at the same time, so that they were both available to infrastructure.
>
> I never got an answer about which one it was better to do first, so we can let whoever does it decide.
>
> Did we want to pick a time, then? It would be helpful if we were definite in the board report as to when we are moving forward.
>
> How about, say, Friday 14-Jan-2005 at 23:59 Pacific Standard Time?
>
> We'd then be able to submit it to infrastructure by Monday.
>
> Of course, people can still continue to work offline and then synch up with the repository. We would just have to be more careful about coordinating work for a few days so as to avoid conflicts.
>
> -Ted.
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. To date we've never had a 2-
> > phase release. We'll start that as of the next release.
> >
> > As for the date, we could move any time. However we do it, we'll
> > need
> > to wait about 24 hours after the last commit to allow time for
> > SF.net
> > to create the nightly tarball of the repository. I'll put a tracer
> > file in as the last commit, to ensure that the tarball contains all
> > of the latest changes. When the time comes, I'll remove everyone's
> > access to the SF CVS repository and then start the 24 hour freeze.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Clinton
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:25:44 -0500, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The quarterly board report is due.
> >>
> >> Could we set a firm date for the transfer of the CVS and SVN
> >> repositories?
> >>
> >> The day the repositories are transferred, we would be able to
> >> apply for graduation.
> >>
> >> The vote for the MyFaces graduation is pending now. It would be
> >> nice if we were next. :)
> >>
> >> -Ted.
> >>
> >> PS - Is iBATIS 2.0.9 considered a "General Availability" release?
> >>
> >> --- Original Message ---
> >> From: "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>
> >> To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:04:40 -0500
> >> Subject: *** QUARTERLY STATUS REPORTS ***
> >>
> >>> The Incubator's Quarterly Report is due next week. All projects
> >>> should e-mail a brief status report (and make sure that their
> >>> STATUS file is up to date) by the weekend.
> >>>
> >>> Mentors, you don't have to do the report yourself, but please do
> >>> make sure that it gets done. :-)
> >>>
> >>> Anyone should feel free to reply with any items that you feel
> >>> are
> >>> going well with the Incubator, or could be improved to make the
> >>> Incubator work better.
> >>>
> >>> --- Noel
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Grade iBATIS 2.0.9 "General Availability"
Posted by Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:11:45 -0500, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
> > Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. To date we've never had a 2-
> > phase release. We'll start that as of the next release.
>
> It doesn't have to two actual phases, in the "release candidate / final release" sense. It's just a matter of following up with a vote after the initial release..
>
> This isn't an official ASF release, but we might get into the habit of confirming the release grades on the list.
>
> Clinton's message already counts as a +1. If Larry and Brandon were to chime in, we could call it a done deal.
>
> As mentioned, I'm not big on voting for the sake of voting, in the fashion of Jakarta projects :), but the ASF takes release grades seriously, and we should get in the habit of holding release votes on the DEV list.
>
> Other than that, it should be business as usual for us. :)
>
> -Ted.
>
>
[VOTE] Grade iBATIS 2.0.9 "General Availability"
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
>�Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. �To date we've never had a 2-
>�phase release. �We'll start that as of the next release.
It doesn't have to two actual phases, in the "release candidate / final release" sense. It's just a matter of following up with a vote after the initial release..
This isn't an official ASF release, but we might get into the habit of confirming the release grades on the list.
Clinton's message already counts as a +1. If Larry and Brandon were to chime in, we could call it a done deal.
As mentioned, I'm not big on voting for the sake of voting, in the fashion of Jakarta projects :), but the ASF takes release grades seriously, and we should get in the habit of holding release votes on the DEV list.
Other than that, it should be business as usual for us. :)
-Ted.
Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
WUSH.NET also does a nightly dump. It might be best if we froze the subversion repository at the same time, so that they were both available to infrastructure.
I never got an answer about which one it was better to do first, so we can let whoever does it decide.
Did we want to pick a time, then? It would be helpful if we were definite in the board report as to when we are moving forward.
How about, say, Friday 14-Jan-2005 at 23:59 Pacific Standard Time?
We'd then be able to submit it to infrastructure by Monday.
Of course, people can still continue to work offline and then synch up with the repository. We would just have to be more careful about coordinating work for a few days so as to avoid conflicts.
-Ted.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
>�Hi Ted,
>
>�Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. �To date we've never had a 2-
>�phase release. �We'll start that as of the next release.
>
>�As for the date, we could move any time. However we do it, we'll
>�need
>�to wait about 24 hours after the last commit to allow time for
>�SF.net
>�to create the nightly tarball of the repository. �I'll put a tracer
>�file in as the last commit, to ensure that the tarball contains all
>�of the latest changes. �When the time comes, I'll remove everyone's
>�access to the SF CVS repository and then start the 24 hour freeze.
>
>�Cheers,
>�Clinton
>
>
>�On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:25:44 -0500, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>
>�wrote:
>
>>�The quarterly board report is due.
>>
>>�Could we set a firm date for the transfer of the CVS and SVN
>>�repositories?
>>
>>�The day the repositories are transferred, we would be able to
>>�apply for graduation.
>>
>>�The vote for the MyFaces graduation is pending now. It would be
>>�nice if we were next. :)
>>
>>�-Ted.
>>
>>�PS - Is iBATIS 2.0.9 considered a "General Availability" release?
>>
>>�--- Original Message ---
>>�From: "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>
>>�To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>�Cc:
>>�Sent: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:04:40 -0500
>>�Subject: *** QUARTERLY STATUS REPORTS ***
>>
>>>�The Incubator's Quarterly Report is due next week. �All projects
>>>�should e-mail a brief status report (and make sure that their
>>>�STATUS file is up to date) by the weekend.
>>>
>>>�Mentors, you don't have to do the report yourself, but please do
>>>�make sure that it gets done. �:-)
>>>
>>>�Anyone should feel free to reply with any items that you feel
>>>�are
>>>�going well with the Incubator, or could be improved to make the
>>>�Incubator work better.
>>>
>>>�--- Noel