You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Shawn Heisey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/12/09 19:32:59 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9837) Performance regression of numeric field uninversion time

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15736092#comment-15736092 ] 

Shawn Heisey edited comment on SOLR-9837 at 12/9/16 7:32 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

What would it take to do something like the following for Solr?

https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/


was (Author: elyograg):
What would it take to do something like the following for Solr?


> Performance regression of numeric field uninversion time
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9837
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9837
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: master (7.0)
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>            Assignee: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: master (7.0)
>
>
> Somehow related to LUCENE-7407, after the transition, the uninvert time of numeric fields has gone up substantially.  I haven't tested all field types yet, just integer fields, which show a 55% performance regression for the initial uninvert time.
> This was tested with a numeric field of cardinality 1M on a 10M doc index.
> {code}
> q=id:1&sort=my_numeric_field desc
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org