You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org> on 2003/06/03 02:53:41 UTC

Am I silly or...

Doesn¹t BufferedInputStream block?  So if these people just used it,
wouldn't all these problems be solved?

On 6/2/03 8:20 PM, "bugzilla@apache.org" <bu...@apache.org> wrote:

> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13478>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13478
> 
> [PATCH] [RFE] POIFS, RawDataBlock: Missing workaround for low performance
> InputStreams
> 
> chris@sixlegs.com changed:
> 
>          What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                CC|                            |shimonp@rogers.com
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From chris@sixlegs.com  2003-06-03 00:20 -------
> *** Bug 15807 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

-- 
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI

http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?