[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6047) Documentation updates for TimelineService v2

["Vrushali C (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022043#comment-16022043 ] 

Vrushali C commented on YARN-6047:
----------------------------------

Thanks [~rohithsharma] for the patch.

I am wondering if we might want to say "records" instead of "flows" in the wording: "retrieve the next set of apps from the given fromid." 

Specifically for lines like 823, 954, 1157, the records returned are not actually flows but apps or entities. The fromid belongs to the flow, but it is basically like a row key prefix, if I understand correctly. 

At line 1299, there is:

{code}
If userid, flowname and flowrunid are not specified, we would have to fetch flow context information based on cluster and appid while executing the query.
{code}
Can this be reworded to say who would have to fetch? We meaning ats will automatically fetch it, is that right.  May be we can say, if these parameters are not specified, they will be retrieved based on cluster + app id and used to look up the information.


> Documentation updates for TimelineService v2
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6047
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6047
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: documentation, timelineserver
>            Reporter: Varun Saxena
>            Assignee: Rohith Sharma K S
>              Labels: yarn-5355-merge-blocker
>         Attachments: YARN-6047-YARN-5355.001.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org