You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@celix.apache.org by Alexander Broekhuis <a....@gmail.com> on 2015/01/29 13:21:50 UTC

Cleanup

Hi all,

With the "new" server based remote service discovery implementation, the
SLP and Bonjour version are (imho) obsolete. Eventually I'd like to see a
SLP/Bonjour version for the server based discovery, so that the discovery
endpoints can be broadcast, but I think the etcd and configured version are
suitable enough for now.

So I'd like to remove the SLP and Bonjour version, so that we have less
code to remove APR from.

Likewise, with the new DM code the old version can be removed.

What do you think?

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Alexander Broekhuis

Re: Cleanup

Posted by Alexander Broekhuis <a....@gmail.com>.
2015-01-29 20:36 GMT+01:00 Bjoern Petri <bj...@sundevil.de>:

>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> My proposal would be to remove them for now, but add them again
> if someone volunteers to bring them up-to-date again.
>
>
Readding them if needed is no problem, but the conceptual solution should
be different. So if they are needed again, I would opt for a new/other
implementation.

But if no-one complains today/tomorrow, I'll remove them somewhere this
weekend/early next week. Restoring them from SVN is always an option if
needed.


-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Alexander Broekhuis

Re: Cleanup

Posted by Bjoern Petri <bj...@sundevil.de>.
Hi Alexander,

My proposal would be to remove them for now, but add them again
if someone volunteers to bring them up-to-date again.

Regards,
   Bjoern



On 01/29/2015 01:21 PM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the "new" server based remote service discovery implementation, the
> SLP and Bonjour version are (imho) obsolete. Eventually I'd like to see a
> SLP/Bonjour version for the server based discovery, so that the discovery
> endpoints can be broadcast, but I think the etcd and configured version are
> suitable enough for now.
>
> So I'd like to remove the SLP and Bonjour version, so that we have less
> code to remove APR from.
>
> Likewise, with the new DM code the old version can be removed.
>
> What do you think?
>