You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/02 16:35:00 UTC

Re: [VOTE] Imperius 1.0.0 rc2

Unless you can convince me otherwise, I think the following files need  
an apache source license header:

  ==./imperius-cimsplextension/build.properties
  ==./imperius-javaspl/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/javaspl/ 
package.html
  ==./imperius-javasplextension/build.properties
  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/package.html
  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/ 
package.html
  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/core/ 
package.html
  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/datastore/ 
package.html
  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/manager/ 
package.html
  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
messages.properties
  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
package.html
  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/resources/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
messages.properties
  ==./imperius-spleditorcore/build.properties
  ==./imperius-spleditorcore/plugin.properties

The NOTICE file needs to be cleaned up, also. Please cleanup the  
formatting. I don't see any Eclipse binaries being included (and also  
don't see an EPL license in the LICENSE file). The IBM copyright date  
for the initial contribution wasn't 2009. So, I'm not sure why it  
would be 2009, now... And delete the "Please read the different  
LICENSE files present in the lib directory of this distribution." I  
don't see any non-Apache licensed materials and even if there were,  
I'd want to see the licenses in the license file, not the lib/  
directory.

I don't know how to actually use Imperius. And don't see any  
instructions on what to do with it. Perhaps I'm missing them?

I'd like to see the KEYS file in svn -- e.g. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/imperius/KEYS

I'm -1 based on the above.

--kevan

On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Neeraj Joshi wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> The Imperius 1.0.0  RC2 release candidate has been tagged, packaged,
> and is ready for a vote. The artifacts, KEYS file, RAT report and  
> release
> notes can
> be found at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jneeraj/apache-imperius-1.0.0-rc2/
>
> The tag from which the release artifacts were generated can be found
> at
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/imperius/tags/release1.0.0rc2/
>
> Revision no is 830752
>
> In addition, my PGP public code signing key can be found at the MIT
> key server (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
>
> Please vote to publish this release by Wednesday, Nov 4 18:00 EST.,
> please include the testing you performed to arrive at your vote
> [  ] +1 Publish
> [  ]   0 Abstain
> [  ] -1 Don't publish, because...
>
> Upon a positive majority of binding votes and no binding vetoes, the
> results of this vote will be brought to the Incubator PMC and voted
> upon there.
>
> Thanks,
> -Neeraj
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "If it weren't for electricity we'd all be watching television by
> candlelight. - George Gobel"
>
> Neeraj Joshi (knee-rudge)
> WebSphere XD - Compute Grid
> AIM, IBM
> Apache Imperius - http://incubator.apache.org/imperius
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Re: [VOTE] Imperius 1.0.0 rc2

Posted by David Wood <da...@us.ibm.com>.
I've updated the Notice.txt to the following:

Apache Imperius
Copyright 2008-2009 The Apache Software Foundation

This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2008


Its checked into the trunk.


David Wood 
Policy Technologies Group
IBM TJ Watson Research Center
dawood@us.ibm.com
914-784-5123 (office), 914-396-6515 (mobile)


Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote on 11/02/2009 11:35:00 AM:

> [image removed] 
> 
> Re: [VOTE] Imperius 1.0.0 rc2
> 
> Kevan Miller 
> 
> to:
> 
> imperius-dev
> 
> 11/02/2009 11:35 AM
> 
> Please respond to imperius-dev
> 
> 
> Unless you can convince me otherwise, I think the following files need 
> an apache source license header:
> 
>   ==./imperius-cimsplextension/build.properties
>   ==./imperius-javaspl/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/javaspl/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-javasplextension/build.properties
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/core/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/datastore/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/manager/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
> messages.properties
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/resources/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
> messages.properties
>   ==./imperius-spleditorcore/build.properties
>   ==./imperius-spleditorcore/plugin.properties
> 
> The NOTICE file needs to be cleaned up, also. Please cleanup the 
> formatting. I don't see any Eclipse binaries being included (and also 
> don't see an EPL license in the LICENSE file). The IBM copyright date 
> for the initial contribution wasn't 2009. So, I'm not sure why it 
> would be 2009, now... And delete the "Please read the different 
> LICENSE files present in the lib directory of this distribution." I 
> don't see any non-Apache licensed materials and even if there were, 
> I'd want to see the licenses in the license file, not the lib/ 
> directory.
> 
> I don't know how to actually use Imperius. And don't see any 
> instructions on what to do with it. Perhaps I'm missing them?
> 
> I'd like to see the KEYS file in svn -- e.g. http://svn.apache.org/
> repos/asf/incubator/imperius/KEYS
> 
> I'm -1 based on the above.
> 
> --kevan
> 
> On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Neeraj Joshi wrote:
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The Imperius 1.0.0  RC2 release candidate has been tagged, packaged,
> > and is ready for a vote. The artifacts, KEYS file, RAT report and 
> > release
> > notes can
> > be found at
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jneeraj/apache-imperius-1.0.0-rc2/
> >
> > The tag from which the release artifacts were generated can be found
> > at
> >
> > 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/imperius/tags/release1.0.0rc2/
> >
> > Revision no is 830752
> >
> > In addition, my PGP public code signing key can be found at the MIT
> > key server (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
> >
> > Please vote to publish this release by Wednesday, Nov 4 18:00 EST.,
> > please include the testing you performed to arrive at your vote
> > [  ] +1 Publish
> > [  ]   0 Abstain
> > [  ] -1 Don't publish, because...
> >
> > Upon a positive majority of binding votes and no binding vetoes, the
> > results of this vote will be brought to the Incubator PMC and voted
> > upon there.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Neeraj
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > "If it weren't for electricity we'd all be watching television by
> > candlelight. - George Gobel"
> >
> > Neeraj Joshi (knee-rudge)
> > WebSphere XD - Compute Grid
> > AIM, IBM
> > Apache Imperius - http://incubator.apache.org/imperius
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 

Re: [VOTE] Imperius 1.0.0 rc2

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Neeraj Joshi wrote:

> From:
> Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
>> Unless you can convince me otherwise, I think the following files  
>> need
>> an apache source license header:
>
>> ==./imperius-cimsplextension/build.properties
>>  ==./imperius-javaspl/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/javaspl/
>> package.html
>>  ==./imperius-javasplextension/build.properties
>>  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/package.html
>>  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/
>> package.html
>>  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/core/
>> package.html
>>  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/ 
>> datastore/
>> package.html
>>  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/manager/
>> package.html
>>  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/util/
>> messages.properties
>>  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/util/
>> package.html
>>  ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/resources/org/apache/imperius/util/
>> messages.properties
>>  ==./imperius-spleditorcore/build.properties
>>  ==./imperius-spleditorcore/plugin.properties
>
>
> The files you listed below do not have any IP per se. The  
> package.html are
> simply package level Javadocs giving a brief intro to what classes are
> included in that particular Java package.
> The build.properties and plugin.properties are eclipse specific  
> properties
> file again with no IP data. Do they still require a license?

Here's ASF Policy -- http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html

In particular:

A file without any degree of creativity in either its literal elements  
or its structure is not protected by copyright law; therefore, such a  
file does not require a license header. If in doubt about the extent  
of the file's creativity, add the license header to the file.

>
>> The NOTICE file needs to be cleaned up, also. Please cleanup the
>> formatting. I don't see any Eclipse binaries being included (and also
>> don't see an EPL license in the LICENSE file). The IBM copyright date
>> for the initial contribution wasn't 2009. So, I'm not sure why it
>> would be 2009, now... And delete the "Please read the different
>> LICENSE files present in the lib directory of this distribution." I
>> don't see any non-Apache licensed materials and even if there were,
>> I'd want to see the licenses in the license file, not the lib/
>> directory.
>
> OK I will update the NOTICE and send it out to the dev list for review
> before spinning another release.
>
>> I don't know how to actually use Imperius. And don't see any
>> instructions on what to do with it. Perhaps I'm missing them?
>
> There are READMEs located inside the binaries but I agree they are  
> buried
> inside. I will create one for the top level
>
>> I'd like to see the KEYS file in svn -- e.g.
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/imperius/KEYS
>
> OK

Thanks.

--kevan

Re: [VOTE] Imperius 1.0.0 rc2

Posted by Neeraj Joshi <jn...@us.ibm.com>.
Kevan,
See my comments below

Thanks
Neeraj
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"If it weren't for electricity we'd all be watching television by 
candlelight. - George Gobel"

Neeraj Joshi (knee-rudge)
WebSphere XD - Compute Grid
AIM, IBM
Apache Imperius - http://incubator.apache.org/imperius
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



From:
Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
To:
imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date:
11/02/2009 11:35 AM
Subject:
Re: [VOTE] Imperius 1.0.0 rc2




> Unless you can convince me otherwise, I think the following files need 
> an apache source license header:

>  ==./imperius-cimsplextension/build.properties
>   ==./imperius-javaspl/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/javaspl/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-javasplextension/build.properties
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/core/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/datastore/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/spl/manager/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
> messages.properties
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/java/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
> package.html
>   ==./imperius-splcore/src/main/resources/org/apache/imperius/util/ 
> messages.properties
>   ==./imperius-spleditorcore/build.properties
>   ==./imperius-spleditorcore/plugin.properties


The files you listed below do not have any IP per se. The package.html are 
simply package level Javadocs giving a brief intro to what classes are 
included in that particular Java package.
The build.properties and plugin.properties are eclipse specific properties 
file again with no IP data. Do they still require a license?

> The NOTICE file needs to be cleaned up, also. Please cleanup the 
> formatting. I don't see any Eclipse binaries being included (and also 
> don't see an EPL license in the LICENSE file). The IBM copyright date 
>  for the initial contribution wasn't 2009. So, I'm not sure why it 
> would be 2009, now... And delete the "Please read the different 
> LICENSE files present in the lib directory of this distribution." I 
> don't see any non-Apache licensed materials and even if there were, 
> I'd want to see the licenses in the license file, not the lib/ 
> directory.

OK I will update the NOTICE and send it out to the dev list for review 
before spinning another release.

> I don't know how to actually use Imperius. And don't see any 
> instructions on what to do with it. Perhaps I'm missing them?

There are READMEs located inside the binaries but I agree they are buried 
inside. I will create one for the top level

> I'd like to see the KEYS file in svn -- e.g. 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/imperius/KEYS

OK 

I'm -1 based on the above.

--kevan

Thanks for your help Kevan.
Neeraj

On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Neeraj Joshi wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> The Imperius 1.0.0  RC2 release candidate has been tagged, packaged,
> and is ready for a vote. The artifacts, KEYS file, RAT report and 
> release
> notes can
> be found at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jneeraj/apache-imperius-1.0.0-rc2/
>
> The tag from which the release artifacts were generated can be found
> at
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/imperius/tags/release1.0.0rc2/
>
> Revision no is 830752
>
> In addition, my PGP public code signing key can be found at the MIT
> key server (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
>
> Please vote to publish this release by Wednesday, Nov 4 18:00 EST.,
> please include the testing you performed to arrive at your vote
> [  ] +1 Publish
> [  ]   0 Abstain
> [  ] -1 Don't publish, because...
>
> Upon a positive majority of binding votes and no binding vetoes, the
> results of this vote will be brought to the Incubator PMC and voted
> upon there.
>
> Thanks,
> -Neeraj
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "If it weren't for electricity we'd all be watching television by
> candlelight. - George Gobel"
>
> Neeraj Joshi (knee-rudge)
> WebSphere XD - Compute Grid
> AIM, IBM
> Apache Imperius - http://incubator.apache.org/imperius
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~