You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@spamassassin.apache.org by wt...@apache.org on 2010/12/19 12:01:50 UTC
svn commit: r1050807 - /spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/kb/20_bug_6156.cf
Author: wtogami
Date: Sun Dec 19 11:01:49 2010
New Revision: 1050807
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1050807&view=rev
Log:
PSBL has been standard for a while now, so reuse is now able to accurately show past performance.
Modified:
spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/kb/20_bug_6156.cf
Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/kb/20_bug_6156.cf
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/kb/20_bug_6156.cf?rev=1050807&r1=1050806&r2=1050807&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/kb/20_bug_6156.cf (original)
+++ spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/kb/20_bug_6156.cf Sun Dec 19 11:01:49 2010
@@ -2,15 +2,5 @@
header RCVD_IN_PSBL eval:check_rbl('psbl-lastexternal', 'psbl.surriel.com.')
describe RCVD_IN_PSBL Received via a relay in PSBL
tflags RCVD_IN_PSBL net
+reuse RCVD_IN_PSBL
# score RCVD_IN_PSBL 0 1.00 0 1.00
-
-# RCVD_IN_PSBL_2WEEKS
-# This rule is only useful in masschecks to measure safety, because
-# PSBL times out addresses in 2 weeks testing older mail is not useful.
-# 0.46/month is roughly 2 weeks in an average month
-ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HeaderEval
-header __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS eval:received_within_months('0', '0.46')
-describe __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS Received: within the past 2 weeks
-meta RCVD_IN_PSBL_2WEEKS RCVD_IN_PSBL && __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS
-tflags RCVD_IN_PSBL_2WEEKS net nopublish
-endif