You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com> on 2007/08/21 15:15:51 UTC
License for stax-api-1.0.1.jar
Axis2 and Axiom redistribute the stax-api-1.0.1.jar file from the Codehaus
StAX project under the Apache License 2.0, however it is not initially
distributed under this license. The jar file does not contain a license
file and the only reference to licensing on the StAX project website (
stax.codehaus.org) is "Open Source (Apache ASL 2.1)", but ASL 2.1 does not
exist.
Does anyone know how the decision was reached in Apache to redistribute this
jar file under AL 2.0? Or where else I should direct this question to?
My question is motivated by Apache Woden release management and incubation
exit criteria. Woden uses Axiom so it also redistributes the
stax-api-1.0.1.jar file, but I can't find any basis for the AL 2.0 license
used by Axiom for the stax jar. We've had suggestions previously to use the
Geronimo StAX API jar instead, but we really need to maintain the correct
Axiom dependencies, so we need to answer this question.
thanks,
John Kaputin.
Re: License for stax-api-1.0.1.jar
Posted by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>.
David,
I don't know if Axiom will work with the Geronimo StAX api jar. I can test
it with Woden, but the decision will rest with the Axiom/Axis2 devs. If
Axiom shipped that jar instead of codehaus it would solve the problem.
John Kaputin.
On 8/22/07, David Illsley <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> John,
> If the geronimo stax-api 1.0 is compatible with the codehaus stax-api
> 1.0.1 then I can't se why we couldn't swap the one used by Axiom... do
> you know if Axiom will work with the geronimo jar?
> David
>
> On 21/08/07, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Axis2 and Axiom redistribute the stax-api-1.0.1.jar file from the
> Codehaus
> > StAX project under the Apache License 2.0, however it is not initially
> > distributed under this license. The jar file does not contain a license
> > file and the only reference to licensing on the StAX project website
> > ( stax.codehaus.org) is "Open Source (Apache ASL 2.1)", but ASL 2.1 does
> not
> > exist.
> >
> > Does anyone know how the decision was reached in Apache to redistribute
> > this jar file under AL 2.0? Or where else I should direct this question
> to?
> >
> > My question is motivated by Apache Woden release management and
> incubation
> > exit criteria. Woden uses Axiom so it also redistributes the
> > stax-api-1.0.1.jar file, but I can't find any basis for the AL 2.0license
> > used by Axiom for the stax jar. We've had suggestions previously to use
> the
> > Geronimo StAX API jar instead, but we really need to maintain the
> correct
> > Axiom dependencies, so we need to answer this question.
> >
> > thanks,
> > John Kaputin.
> >
>
>
> --
> David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: License for stax-api-1.0.1.jar
Posted by David Illsley <da...@gmail.com>.
John,
If the geronimo stax-api 1.0 is compatible with the codehaus stax-api
1.0.1 then I can't se why we couldn't swap the one used by Axiom... do
you know if Axiom will work with the geronimo jar?
David
On 21/08/07, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Axis2 and Axiom redistribute the stax-api-1.0.1.jar file from the Codehaus
> StAX project under the Apache License 2.0, however it is not initially
> distributed under this license. The jar file does not contain a license
> file and the only reference to licensing on the StAX project website
> (stax.codehaus.org) is "Open Source (Apache ASL 2.1)", but ASL 2.1 does not
> exist.
>
> Does anyone know how the decision was reached in Apache to redistribute
> this jar file under AL 2.0? Or where else I should direct this question to?
>
> My question is motivated by Apache Woden release management and incubation
> exit criteria. Woden uses Axiom so it also redistributes the
> stax-api-1.0.1.jar file, but I can't find any basis for the AL 2.0 license
> used by Axiom for the stax jar. We've had suggestions previously to use the
> Geronimo StAX API jar instead, but we really need to maintain the correct
> Axiom dependencies, so we need to answer this question.
>
> thanks,
> John Kaputin.
>
--
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org