Re: 97.proxy-02.tar.gz

["Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>]

> On Sun, 11 Feb 1996, Alexei Kosut wrote:
> 
>> As you may recall, I vetoed patch 97 because it failed to link on my
>> system. I got it to link, and it caused a SIGSEGV. But I fixed that, too,
>> and I'm willing to change my -1 to a +1 if the following patch is applied
>> to mod_proxy.c: 
> 
> (yes, I'm responding to my own email). BTW, I've put this into
> for_Apache_1.0.2/102.proxy_hpux.patch, just to make things less (or more,
> depending on how you look at it) confusing. Needless to say, I vote +1 on
> it. 

Ummm, rather than introducing a patch for a patch, how about just 
creating a 97a?  The dependencies between patches in the current
round are already too confusing.

......Roy

Re: 97.proxy-02.tar.gz

[Alexei Kosut <ak...@nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us>]

On Sun, 11 Feb 1996, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> Ummm, rather than introducing a patch for a patch, how about just 
> creating a 97a?  The dependencies between patches in the current
> round are already too confusing.

Mainly because it's not a patch, but a tarfile with lots of stuff in it. 
It's less confusing to patch it then to redo it (and probably screw
something else up in the meanwhile).

--/ Alexei Kosut <ak...@nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us> /--------/ Lefler on IRC
----------------------------/ <http://www.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us/~akosut/>
The viewpoints expressed above are entirely false, and in no way
represent Alexei Kosut nor any other person or entity. /--------------