You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Benjamin Bentmann (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2009/12/28 19:24:55 UTC
[jira] Closed: (MSHADE-7) Shade should generate code, not replace
the jar
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-7?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Benjamin Bentmann closed MSHADE-7.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Benjamin Bentmann
The proposed workflow doesn't play nicely with IDE tooling which creates the class path from the (non-shaded!) dependencies specified in the POM.
> Shade should generate code, not replace the jar
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSHADE-7
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-7
> Project: Maven 2.x Shade Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Dan Fabulich
> Assignee: Benjamin Bentmann
>
> I frequently get errors replacing the output jar. (That's MSHADE-5.) It seems to me that it would be better if shade operated during the generate-sources phase, dropping the generated dependencies into a target/generated-sources directory.
> That way I could write my code directly against the shaded classes (rather than requiring shade do do the extra work of shading me as well).
> That would have the benefit of not needing to replace the artifact at package time, knocking out MSHADE-5, and making MSHADE-6 irrelevant as well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira