You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com> on 2001/12/27 02:39:57 UTC
Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
Bill
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net> writes:
> Bill Stoddard wrote:
> >
> > I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
>
> sounds good. Hopefully we'll have a quorum available to pound on the
> tagged code on various platforms. We haven't heard from Madhu in a
> while, but if we roll on daedalus HP-UX should be OK.
FWIW, I haven't had problems lately with my regression builds on HP-UX
11.
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net>.
Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
sounds good. Hopefully we'll have a quorum available to pound on the
tagged code on various platforms. We haven't heard from Madhu in a
while, but if we roll on daedalus HP-UX should be OK.
Greg
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 08:39:57PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
I was about to suggest the same thing. =) -- justin
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by dr...@jetnet.co.uk.
Commit it and we'll review.
I have a patch that I'll try to get to the list tomorrow, though it
probably won't be suitable for commit prior to the next roll.
With it the worker MPM builds on BeOS simply by using --with-mpm=worker on
the configure line :)
With some work the same would apply to the other MPM's as well.
david
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:24:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com> writes:
>>
>> > I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
>>
>> Hopefully Aaron can get his thread-exit fixes in soon?
>
> I can commit them right now if we would prefer C-T-R.
>
> -aaron
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:24:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com> writes:
> >
> > > I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
> >
> > Hopefully Aaron can get his thread-exit fixes in soon?
>
> I can commit them right now if we would prefer C-T-R.
As I understand it, you have tested on the platforms you have access
to and worst-case scenario for the other platforms is that a minor
tweak might be needed. If that is accurate, then I'm comfortable with
you committing it right now.
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
I say commit and we'll review.
I've also got a patch that I'll try to get to the list tomorrow once I have
time to tidy it up a little.
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Bannert" <aa...@clove.org>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:24:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com> writes:
> >
> > > I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
> >
> > Hopefully Aaron can get his thread-exit fixes in soon?
>
> I can commit them right now if we would prefer C-T-R.
>
> -aaron
>
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:24:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com> writes:
>
> > I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
>
> Hopefully Aaron can get his thread-exit fixes in soon?
I can commit them right now if we would prefer C-T-R.
-aaron
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
"Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com> writes:
> I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
Hopefully Aaron can get his thread-exit fixes in soon?
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Brian Pane <br...@cnet.com> writes:
> >Things seem pretty stable right now. I'd like to see us push out a couple
> >more big betas with wide publicity (and usage) before we go GA.
> Sounds good to me
>
> --Brian
+1!
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Brian Pane <br...@cnet.com>.
Aaron Bannert wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:07:48PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
>
>>Bill Stoddard wrote:
>>
>>>I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
>>>
>>>Bill
>>>
>>The tag+roll sounds okay with me, unless you want to wait for
>>the bucket free list code (the stuff that Cliff is working on)--
>>since that's the last significant design change that I've heard
>>of for 2.0.
>>
>
>There's no reason we can't tag now and push out another alpha/beta, and
>do the same thing in a week or so when the bucket freelist gets committed.
>The more often we do a beta the more people we'll have testing our code.
>
>Things seem pretty stable right now. I'd like to see us push out a couple
>more big betas with wide publicity (and usage) before we go GA.
>
Sounds good to me
--Brian
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:07:48PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> >I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
> >
> >Bill
> >
>
> The tag+roll sounds okay with me, unless you want to wait for
> the bucket free list code (the stuff that Cliff is working on)--
> since that's the last significant design change that I've heard
> of for 2.0.
There's no reason we can't tag now and push out another alpha/beta, and
do the same thing in a week or so when the bucket freelist gets committed.
The more often we do a beta the more people we'll have testing our code.
Things seem pretty stable right now. I'd like to see us push out a couple
more big betas with wide publicity (and usage) before we go GA.
-aaron
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Cliff Woolley <jw...@virginia.edu>.
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
> The tag+roll sounds okay with me, unless you want to wait for
> the bucket free list code (the stuff that Cliff is working on)--
> since that's the last significant design change that I've heard
> of for 2.0.
That code is close (will be done within the week), but it touches a lot of
things and will need a good bit of review/discussion no doubt before being
committed. So I say go ahead and roll another version within the next few
days before I have a chance to break things. ;-) Plus that way we'll
hopefully have a good "before and after" set of versions to compare to see
how much good the buckets freelist stuff actually does us.
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Brian Pane <br...@cnet.com>.
Bill Stoddard wrote:
>I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
>
>Bill
>
The tag+roll sounds okay with me, unless you want to wait for
the bucket free list code (the stuff that Cliff is working on)--
since that's the last significant design change that I've heard
of for 2.0.
--Brian
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:39:39AM -0500, Dale Ghent wrote:
> mod_ssl still identifies itself as alpha code. Is this not the case
> anymore?
Well, does it work for you? The only outstanding issue I'm aware of
is that shmem session caching isn't implemented. And, it really is
waiting for someone to actually code it up. (For some reason, I
never get around to it.) -- justin
Re: Time for and Apache 2.0 Tag and Roll?
Posted by Dale Ghent <da...@elemental.org>.
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
| I'll tag in a few days if I don't hear any dissent.
mod_ssl still identifies itself as alpha code. Is this not the case
anymore?
/dale