You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Michael Monnerie <m....@zmi.at> on 2005/11/09 09:51:26 UTC
Re: per-user or global bayes (was: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?)
On Mittwoch, 9. November 2005 08:04 Gary W. Smith wrote:
> My users are quite happy
> with overall markup of the spam. We occasionally get a HAM marked as
> SPAM. We have an odd client base though.
The question is: when to use global and when per-user bayes?
On our server, we have people of different languages, communicating with
different countries all over the world, in different areas
(advertising, production, IT, etc.). I thought in that case a per-user
bayes would be much better, as viagra is something good for the one,
but bad for the other.
What's the general recommendation for bayes?
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --- it-management Michael Monnerie
// http://zmi.at Tel: 0660/4156531 Linux 2.6.11
// PGP Key: "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi2.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: EB93 ED8A 1DCD BB6C F952 F7F4 3911 B933 7054 5879
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x70545879
Re: per-user or global bayes (was: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?)
Posted by email builder <em...@yahoo.com>.
bump
--- Michael Monnerie <m....@zmi.at> wrote:
> > My users are quite happy
> > with overall markup of the spam. We occasionally get a HAM marked as
> > SPAM. We have an odd client base though.
>
> The question is: when to use global and when per-user bayes?
>
> On our server, we have people of different languages, communicating with
> different countries all over the world, in different areas
> (advertising, production, IT, etc.). I thought in that case a per-user
> bayes would be much better, as viagra is something good for the one,
> but bad for the other.
>
> What's the general recommendation for bayes?
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com