You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to bugs@apr.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2007/01/07 23:35:45 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40971] - apr_thread_cond_signal insufficiently documented

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40971>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40971





------- Additional Comments From jorton@redhat.com  2007-01-07 14:35 -------
I don't think it's a good idea to specify platform-specific behaviour in the API
like that.  If it's not possible for APR to make any strong API guarantee across
all implementations in this particular case, the API should just state that
explicitly:

"If no threads are blocked on the condition variable, the behaviour is unspecified."


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@apr.apache.org