You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> on 2015/08/31 21:34:00 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1698084 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
On 08/27/2015 08:57 AM, jkaluza@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jkaluza
> Date: Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015
> New Revision: 1698084
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1698084
> Log:
> Vote
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1698084&r1=1698083&r2=1698084&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> None, only 2.2.x specific
> Backport version for 2.2.x of patch:
> http://people.apache.org/~rpluem/patches/pr58267.diff
> - +1: rpluem,
> + +1: rpluem, jkaluza
>
>
> PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
>
>
>
I know that I saw positive feedback or better +1's on the dev list and that this counts as well, but to ease
documentation and to be sure that we all talked about the same I would like to see these +1's going in STATUS if they
are still valid.
I have Yann and Jim on my mind :-).
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: svn commit: r1698084 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Posted by William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2015 08:57 AM, jkaluza@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: jkaluza
> > Date: Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015
> > New Revision: 1698084
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1698084
> > Log:
> > Vote
> >
> > Modified:
> > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> >
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1698084&r1=1698083&r2=1698084&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015
> > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> > None, only 2.2.x specific
> > Backport version for 2.2.x of patch:
> > http://people.apache.org/~rpluem/patches/pr58267.diff
> > - +1: rpluem,
> > + +1: rpluem, jkaluza
>
> I know that I saw positive feedback or better +1's on the dev list and
> that this counts as well, but to ease
> documentation and to be sure that we all talked about the same I would
> like to see these +1's going in STATUS if they
> are still valid.
> I have Yann and Jim on my mind :-).
>
No need, provided we acknowledge 'Reviewed by:' in the commit message for
the backport.
Re: svn commit: r1698084 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Posted by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> I know that I saw positive feedback or better +1's on the dev list and that this counts as well, but to ease
> documentation and to be sure that we all talked about the same I would like to see these +1's going in STATUS if they
> are still valid.
> I have Yann and Jim on my mind :-).
Promoted in r1700327, thanks for fixing this!