You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@camel.apache.org by diwakar <di...@nsn.com> on 2011/09/30 20:31:13 UTC

Re: Thread pool for components in Camel

Hi, 

          Thanks for the reply. With async and defaultThreadPoolProfile, is
Camel support for parallel processing as good as Servicemix 3.x. Are there
any known limitations in Camel over JBI(Servicemix3.x). Is there any good
reason to use Servicemix JBI instead of Camel.
          Please let me know your comment.

With Best Regards,
Diwakar

--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Thread-pool-for-components-in-Camel-tp4722190p4858019.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Thread pool for components in Camel

Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:31 PM, diwakar <di...@nsn.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>          Thanks for the reply. With async and defaultThreadPoolProfile, is
> Camel support for parallel processing as good as Servicemix 3.x. Are there
> any known limitations in Camel over JBI(Servicemix3.x). Is there any good
> reason to use Servicemix JBI instead of Camel.
>          Please let me know your comment.
>

No JBI is dying/dead.
http://gnodet.blogspot.com/2010/12/thoughts-about-servicemix.html

For new projects you should consider *not* to use JBI, unless you are
already use JBI a lot,
and are happy with it as is.

We recommend to use Camel as replacement for JBI in SMX.



> With Best Regards,
> Diwakar
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Thread-pool-for-components-in-Camel-tp4722190p4858019.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/