[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10999) Use more generic "low redundancy" blocks instead of "under replicated" blocks

["Wei-Chiu Chuang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15955938#comment-15955938 ] 

Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10999:
----------------------------------------

[~manojg] thanks for working on this. The direction of the discussion has deviated from the original purpose, so please update the summary of the jira accordingly when you upload the patch.

Thx!

> Use more generic "low redundancy" blocks instead of "under replicated" blocks
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10999
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10999
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: erasure-coding
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1
>            Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>            Assignee: Manoj Govindassamy
>              Labels: hdfs-ec-3.0-nice-to-have, supportability
>
> Per HDFS-9857, it seems in the Hadoop 3 world, people prefer the more generic term "low redundancy" to the old-fashioned "under replicated". But this term is still being used in messages in several places, such as web ui, dfsadmin and fsck. We should probably change them to avoid confusion.
> File this jira to discuss it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org