You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Ben M. (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/12/12 15:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (MCHECKSTYLE-264) Should checkstyle check the license of a file

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16994797#comment-16994797 ] 

Ben M. commented on MCHECKSTYLE-264:
------------------------------------

I forgot the Licence header in a new file and the check already failed. I think this can be closed now.

> Should checkstyle check the license of a file
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MCHECKSTYLE-264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-264
>             Project: Maven Checkstyle Plugin
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently i have issues related to that checkstyle checks the license of a file and apache-rat-plugin will do as well. This is from my point of view duplicated....The question which of the plugins should be responsible for licenses. I would vote for apache-rat-plugin?
> In the example in JXR i have to make a configuration for apache-rat-plugin and for checkstyle plugin.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)