You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to scm-dev@maven.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2008/08/15 05:10:30 UTC
convenience POM for "standard" providers?
Hi,
Dan brought this up on #maven IRC - he was looking for an easy way to
import all the providers without listing them, and so is adding a
dependency on the scm plugin.
Would it make sense to have a POM in the build that lists the standard
providers, which could be used for importing into other builds
conveniently?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: convenience POM for "standard" providers?
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Done (SCM-400). I excluded the "local" provider. I also update the SCM
plugin POM to use it.
- Brett
On 15/08/2008, at 9:04 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> +1
>
> Vincent
>
> 2008/8/14 Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Dan brought this up on #maven IRC - he was looking for an easy way
>> to import
>> all the providers without listing them, and so is adding a
>> dependency on the
>> scm plugin.
>>
>> Would it make sense to have a POM in the build that lists the
>> standard
>> providers, which could be used for importing into other builds
>> conveniently?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: convenience POM for "standard" providers?
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1
Vincent
2008/8/14 Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Dan brought this up on #maven IRC - he was looking for an easy way to import
> all the providers without listing them, and so is adding a dependency on the
> scm plugin.
>
> Would it make sense to have a POM in the build that lists the standard
> providers, which could be used for importing into other builds conveniently?
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>