You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Gary Tully (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/10/03 23:42:44 UTC
[jira] [Reopened] (AMQ-4564) ActiveMQ creates & initializes
ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in wrong database when using separate lock data source
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Gary Tully reopened AMQ-4564:
-----------------------------
Assignee: Gary Tully
The support for table creation by the jdbc lockers (createTablesOnStartup attribute) from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365 sorts this
> ActiveMQ creates & initializes ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in wrong database when using separate lock data source
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-4564
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4564
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 5.5.1
> Reporter: Tim Boemker
> Assignee: Gary Tully
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: activemq.log, broker-config.xml
>
>
> When configured to use a secondary database for locking, ActiveMQ creates and initializes ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the primary database. It then starts as slave because it can't lock the table in the secondary database.
> Workaround: manually copy the ACTIVEMQ_LOCK table from the primary database to the secondary database.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)