You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by ds...@apache.org on 2022/01/10 21:45:27 UTC
svn commit: r1896898 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Author: dsahlberg
Date: Mon Jan 10 21:45:27 2022
New Revision: 1896898
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1896898&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Vote for r1896877
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1896898&r1=1896897&r2=1896898&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Mon Jan 10 21:45:27 2022
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Candidate changes:
Justification:
Documentation should be correct.
Votes:
- +1: stsp
+ +1: stsp, dsahlberg
Veto-blocked changes:
=====================
Re: svn commit: r1896898 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Posted by Nathan Hartman <ha...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:51 PM Daniel Sahlberg
<da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Den mån 10 jan. 2022 kl 22:45 skrev <ds...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Author: dsahlberg
>> Date: Mon Jan 10 21:45:27 2022
>> New Revision: 1896898
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1896898&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * STATUS: Vote for r1896877
(snip)
> As far as I understand it, this change require three (or two, for a non-LTS) votes, even though this is only a documentation fix, right?
Yes that's correct. It's in core code and a LTS release... I added the
3rd vote, approving, in r1896905.
Thanks,
Nathan
Re: svn commit: r1896898 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Posted by Nathan Hartman <ha...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:51 PM Daniel Sahlberg
<da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Den mån 10 jan. 2022 kl 22:45 skrev <ds...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Author: dsahlberg
>> Date: Mon Jan 10 21:45:27 2022
>> New Revision: 1896898
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1896898&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * STATUS: Vote for r1896877
(snip)
> As far as I understand it, this change require three (or two, for a non-LTS) votes, even though this is only a documentation fix, right?
Yes that's correct. It's in core code and a LTS release... I added the
3rd vote, approving, in r1896905.
Thanks,
Nathan
Re: svn commit: r1896898 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den mån 10 jan. 2022 kl 22:45 skrev <ds...@apache.org>:
> Author: dsahlberg
> Date: Mon Jan 10 21:45:27 2022
> New Revision: 1896898
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1896898&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Vote for r1896877
>
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1896898&r1=1896897&r2=1896898&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Mon Jan 10 21:45:27 2022
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Candidate changes:
> Justification:
> Documentation should be correct.
> Votes:
> - +1: stsp
> + +1: stsp, dsahlberg
>
> Veto-blocked changes:
> =====================
>
>
>
As far as I understand it, this change require three (or two, for a
non-LTS) votes, even though this is only a documentation fix, right?
/Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1896898 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den mån 10 jan. 2022 kl 22:45 skrev <ds...@apache.org>:
> Author: dsahlberg
> Date: Mon Jan 10 21:45:27 2022
> New Revision: 1896898
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1896898&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Vote for r1896877
>
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1896898&r1=1896897&r2=1896898&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Mon Jan 10 21:45:27 2022
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Candidate changes:
> Justification:
> Documentation should be correct.
> Votes:
> - +1: stsp
> + +1: stsp, dsahlberg
>
> Veto-blocked changes:
> =====================
>
>
>
As far as I understand it, this change require three (or two, for a
non-LTS) votes, even though this is only a documentation fix, right?
/Daniel