You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> on 2017/08/14 05:39:20 UTC
Log4j 2.9
I’d like to start the release process next weekend for Log4j 2.9. I believe there is some web site work that has to take place for that to happen to integrate with the new Scala release. Has Scala been published to the web site? I can’t find it in SVN.
Ralph
Re: Log4j 2.9
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
Alright, I'll try to get that committed early this week. I've been finally
(for real this time) wrapping up work stuff that was taking too much of my
time and energy, so I should be able to get back on this.
On 14 August 2017 at 10:56, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> If you can get the scala site checked in I can figure out how to do link
> them.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 14, 2017, at 7:00 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Scala site hasn't been committed to SVN as I wasn't exactly sure how
> to
> > go about integrating it properly. I do think we should get that
> integrated
> > first. I'm not exactly sure where the links should go in the 2.9 version
> of
> > the site as they're no longer components of the release.
> >
> > On 14 August 2017 at 00:39, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I’d like to start the release process next weekend for Log4j 2.9. I
> >> believe there is some web site work that has to take place for that to
> >> happen to integrate with the new Scala release. Has Scala been
> published to
> >> the web site? I can’t find it in SVN.
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: Log4j 2.9
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
If you can get the scala site checked in I can figure out how to do link them.
Ralph
> On Aug 14, 2017, at 7:00 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The Scala site hasn't been committed to SVN as I wasn't exactly sure how to
> go about integrating it properly. I do think we should get that integrated
> first. I'm not exactly sure where the links should go in the 2.9 version of
> the site as they're no longer components of the release.
>
> On 14 August 2017 at 00:39, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>> I’d like to start the release process next weekend for Log4j 2.9. I
>> believe there is some web site work that has to take place for that to
>> happen to integrate with the new Scala release. Has Scala been published to
>> the web site? I can’t find it in SVN.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: Log4j 2.9
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
The Scala site hasn't been committed to SVN as I wasn't exactly sure how to
go about integrating it properly. I do think we should get that integrated
first. I'm not exactly sure where the links should go in the 2.9 version of
the site as they're no longer components of the release.
On 14 August 2017 at 00:39, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> I’d like to start the release process next weekend for Log4j 2.9. I
> believe there is some web site work that has to take place for that to
> happen to integrate with the new Scala release. Has Scala been published to
> the web site? I can’t find it in SVN.
>
> Ralph
>
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>