You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4net-dev@logging.apache.org by "Dominik Psenner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/10/08 09:33:41 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13789012#comment-13789012 ] 

Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-397:
-----------------------------------------

Since you have to share assemblies, it may be time to learn about the GAC:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/yf1d93sz.aspx

> Conflicts due to new strong name key
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4NET-397
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397
>             Project: Log4net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Joe
>
> Consider an application that uses two third-party assemblies:
> - AssemblyA from Supplier A, compiled with log4net 1.2.10 (old strong-name key)
> - AssemblyB from Supplier B, compiled with log4net 1.2.11 (new strong-name key)
> How can I make these two assemblies co-exist and use the same version of log4net?
> Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I can't see any way to do this: for example I obviously can't have both log4net assemblies in the same bin folder, as they have the same name.
> I'm obviously not the only one who thinks there's a problem, e.g. issue LOG4NET-324 refers to "... the strong name horror too".  The comment on this issue:
> "... But if you need the old "strong name", you can simply use the "oldkey" binaries. I can't see how this is a horror, but of course I'm biased."
> doesn't seem to address the problem of conflicts.
> Also there are no guidelines for component suppliers as to which version to use, which increases the risk of conflicts.  In the absence of explicit guidelines, I guess legacy components will have the old key, whereas new ones will tend to use the new key, since that is the only version available via NuGet.
> The only solution I can see is the following:
> - The "new key" assembly needs to have a different name from the "old key" assembly (e.g. log4net-2.dll).
> - Use Type forwarding to enable both versions to co-exist.  E.g. you could supply a special log4net.dll signed with the old key that uses type forwarding to forward to log4net-2.dll signed with the new key.  Or vice-versa.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)