You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@deltacloud.apache.org by David Lutterkort <lu...@redhat.com> on 2010/10/30 02:01:05 UTC
[VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Hi,
as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
deltacloud 0.1.0.
The release candidate can be found at
http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
David
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Tobias Crawley <tc...@redhat.com>.
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 16:28 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 17:01 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
> > deltacloud 0.1.0.
> >
> > The release candidate can be found at
> > http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
> >
> > Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
> > Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
> > http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
>
> Is everybody suffering from premature voter's exhaustion ? I count two
> votes so far (Michal's and mine) .. anybody else want to chime in ?
>
> David
>
>
+1 for release.
- Toby
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by "marios@redhat.com" <ma...@redhat.com>.
I believe Michal went through the code and sent out some patches with
the missing license headers ("[PATCH core] Added ASF license header to
files" 23 Nov). These have been acked so they should be in the latest
version of core soon
marios
On 07/12/10 16:57, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 08:23 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>> On 11/19/2010 12:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Carl Trieloff<cc...@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Jim,
>>>>
>>>> I remember at one point there was a discussion that if 3 mentors
>>>> +1'ed on
>>>> this
>>>> list, then the IPMC only needs to be notified. If there are not 3
>>>> member
>>>> votes then
>>>> the vote needs to be had on the incubator list. Did that discussion go
>>>> anywhere
>>>> (do you know)... i.e. if that is an option there are enough mentors
>>>> on the
>>>> project
>>>> to complete the vote on the dev list and we should ping the mentors.
>>>>
>>>> What is the current state on this in incubator?
>>>> Carl.
>>> While in Incubator, you need to request IPMC approval for releases. If
>>> you already have the 3 binding IPMC votes, then it's just a matter of
>>> waiting the 72hrs period in the general@ list.
>>
>>
>> I've spent a bit of time looking through the release.
>>
>> Few issues:
>>
>> - It is common practice to have the ASL license header in the top of
>> all source
>> files in the release. I would like to see that we follow that common
>> practice.
>>
>> For example server.ru and deltacloud.rb in the core package have no
>> license headers,
>> the client tz seems to be much better applied with license headers
>> than core.
>>
>> - The release will also need to be signed to pass IPMC review.
>>
>> If the above two issues are resolved I'll +1 the release.
>>
>> Carl.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> After some discussion with Jim, it is understood that we can add the
> headers in the
> next release as we have the main license file. I'm thus placing my +1 vote.
>
> +1 -- release deltacloud.
>
> Carl.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
On 11/22/2010 08:23 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 12:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Carl
>> Trieloff<cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Jim,
>>>
>>> I remember at one point there was a discussion that if 3 mentors
>>> +1'ed on
>>> this
>>> list, then the IPMC only needs to be notified. If there are not 3
>>> member
>>> votes then
>>> the vote needs to be had on the incubator list. Did that discussion go
>>> anywhere
>>> (do you know)... i.e. if that is an option there are enough mentors
>>> on the
>>> project
>>> to complete the vote on the dev list and we should ping the mentors.
>>>
>>> What is the current state on this in incubator?
>>> Carl.
>> While in Incubator, you need to request IPMC approval for releases. If
>> you already have the 3 binding IPMC votes, then it's just a matter of
>> waiting the 72hrs period in the general@ list.
>
>
> I've spent a bit of time looking through the release.
>
> Few issues:
>
> - It is common practice to have the ASL license header in the top of
> all source
> files in the release. I would like to see that we follow that common
> practice.
>
> For example server.ru and deltacloud.rb in the core package have no
> license headers,
> the client tz seems to be much better applied with license headers
> than core.
>
> - The release will also need to be signed to pass IPMC review.
>
> If the above two issues are resolved I'll +1 the release.
>
> Carl.
>
>
>
After some discussion with Jim, it is understood that we can add the
headers in the
next release as we have the main license file. I'm thus placing my +1 vote.
+1 -- release deltacloud.
Carl.
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
On 11/19/2010 12:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Carl Trieloff<cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Jim,
>>
>> I remember at one point there was a discussion that if 3 mentors +1'ed on
>> this
>> list, then the IPMC only needs to be notified. If there are not 3 member
>> votes then
>> the vote needs to be had on the incubator list. Did that discussion go
>> anywhere
>> (do you know)... i.e. if that is an option there are enough mentors on the
>> project
>> to complete the vote on the dev list and we should ping the mentors.
>>
>> What is the current state on this in incubator?
>> Carl.
>>
> While in Incubator, you need to request IPMC approval for releases. If
> you already have the 3 binding IPMC votes, then it's just a matter of
> waiting the 72hrs period in the general@ list.
>
I've spent a bit of time looking through the release.
Few issues:
- It is common practice to have the ASL license header in the top of all
source
files in the release. I would like to see that we follow that common
practice.
For example server.ru and deltacloud.rb in the core package have no
license headers,
the client tz seems to be much better applied with license headers than
core.
- The release will also need to be signed to pass IPMC review.
If the above two issues are resolved I'll +1 the release.
Carl.
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> I remember at one point there was a discussion that if 3 mentors +1'ed on
> this
> list, then the IPMC only needs to be notified. If there are not 3 member
> votes then
> the vote needs to be had on the incubator list. Did that discussion go
> anywhere
> (do you know)... i.e. if that is an option there are enough mentors on the
> project
> to complete the vote on the dev list and we should ping the mentors.
>
> What is the current state on this in incubator?
> Carl.
While in Incubator, you need to request IPMC approval for releases. If
you already have the 3 binding IPMC votes, then it's just a matter of
waiting the 72hrs period in the general@ list.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
On 11/19/2010 08:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 11:19 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 09:33 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> Did I miss the release?
>>>
>> No, you didn't - if I understand correctly, the next step is to call for
>> a vote on the general@ mailing list, right ?
>>
>>
> Yeppers... it should reference this vote and its result.
>
>
Jim,
I remember at one point there was a discussion that if 3 mentors +1'ed
on this
list, then the IPMC only needs to be notified. If there are not 3 member
votes then
the vote needs to be had on the incubator list. Did that discussion go
anywhere
(do you know)... i.e. if that is an option there are enough mentors on
the project
to complete the vote on the dev list and we should ping the mentors.
What is the current state on this in incubator?
Carl.
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Nov 18, 2010, at 11:19 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 09:33 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Did I miss the release?
>
> No, you didn't - if I understand correctly, the next step is to call for
> a vote on the general@ mailing list, right ?
>
Yeppers... it should reference this vote and its result.
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by David Lutterkort <lu...@redhat.com>.
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 09:33 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Did I miss the release?
No, you didn't - if I understand correctly, the next step is to call for
a vote on the general@ mailing list, right ?
David
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Did I miss the release?
On Nov 2, 2010, at 4:36 AM, Ladislav Martincik wrote:
> :-) +1
>
> -- Ladislav
>
> On Nov 2, 2010, at 12:28 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 17:01 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
>>> deltacloud 0.1.0.
>>>
>>> The release candidate can be found at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
>>>
>>> Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
>>> Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
>>> http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
>>
>> Is everybody suffering from premature voter's exhaustion ? I count two
>> votes so far (Michal's and mine) .. anybody else want to chime in ?
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Ladislav Martincik <lm...@redhat.com>.
:-) +1
-- Ladislav
On Nov 2, 2010, at 12:28 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 17:01 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
>> deltacloud 0.1.0.
>>
>> The release candidate can be found at
>> http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
>>
>> Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
>> Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
>> http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
>
> Is everybody suffering from premature voter's exhaustion ? I count two
> votes so far (Michal's and mine) .. anybody else want to chime in ?
>
> David
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by David Lutterkort <lu...@redhat.com>.
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 17:01 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
> deltacloud 0.1.0.
>
> The release candidate can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
>
> Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
> Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
> http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
Is everybody suffering from premature voter's exhaustion ? I count two
votes so far (Michal's and mine) .. anybody else want to chime in ?
David
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Michal Fojtik <mf...@redhat.com>.
On 29/10/10 17:01 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
>Hi,
>
>as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
>deltacloud 0.1.0.
>
>The release candidate can be found at
>http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
>
>Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
>Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
>http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
Voting for release.
+1
-- Michal
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Michal Fojtik, mfojtik@redhat.com
Deltacloud API: http://deltacloud.org
--------------------------------------------------------
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
-- dims
On 12/07/2010 10:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1
>
> On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:01 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
>> deltacloud 0.1.0.
>>
>> The release candidate can be found at
>> http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
>>
>> Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
>> Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
>> http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
+1
On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:01 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
> deltacloud 0.1.0.
>
> The release candidate can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
>
> Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
> Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
> http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
>
> David
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by David Lutterkort <lu...@redhat.com>.
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 09:52 +0100, Ladislav Martincik wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> maybe you could push it on rubygems.org with beta flag. Something like
> deltacloud-0.1.0.rc1.gem. We could install it with just: gem install
> deltacloud-client||core --pre
>
> Just idea. I like to do things the Ruby way. ;-)
I didn't want to circulate anything too widely before this is an
official release, though I am not sure what the exact Apache policy is.
David
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by Ladislav Martincik <lm...@redhat.com>.
Hi David,
maybe you could push it on rubygems.org with beta flag. Something like deltacloud-0.1.0.rc1.gem. We could install it with just: gem install deltacloud-client||core --pre
Just idea. I like to do things the Ruby way. ;-)
-- Ladislav
On Oct 30, 2010, at 2:01 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
> deltacloud 0.1.0.
>
> The release candidate can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
>
> Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
> Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
> http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
>
> David
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.1.0
Posted by "marios@redhat.com" <ma...@redhat.com>.
On 30/10/10 03:01, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as mentioned previously here, I uploaded a release candidate for
> deltacloud 0.1.0.
>
> The release candidate can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.1.0/rc1/
>
> Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.1.0 release by
> Monday, 2010-11-02 17:00 PDT (Tuesday 2010-11-03 0:00 UTC, see
> http://bit.ly/9CJWob for other local times)
>
> David
>
>
>
>
+1 for release
marios