You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/10/24 05:07:57 UTC
[GitHub] [spark] amaliujia commented on a diff in pull request #38301: [SPARK-40836][CONNECT] AnalyzeResult should use struct for schema
amaliujia commented on code in PR #38301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38301#discussion_r1002885859
##########
connector/connect/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/connect/planner/DataTypeProtoConverter.scala:
##########
@@ -50,11 +50,27 @@ object DataTypeProtoConverter {
proto.DataType.newBuilder().setI32(proto.DataType.I32.getDefaultInstance).build()
case StringType =>
proto.DataType.newBuilder().setString(proto.DataType.String.getDefaultInstance).build()
+ case LongType =>
+ proto.DataType.newBuilder().setI64(proto.DataType.I64.getDefaultInstance).build()
+ case struct: StructType =>
+ toConnectProtoStructType(struct)
case _ =>
throw InvalidPlanInput(s"Does not support convert ${t.typeName} to connect proto types.")
}
}
+ def toConnectProtoStructType(schema: StructType): proto.DataType = {
+ val struct = proto.DataType.Struct.newBuilder()
+ for (structField <- schema.fields) {
+ struct.addFields(
+ proto.DataType.StructField
+ .newBuilder()
+ .setName(structField.name)
+ .setType(toConnectProtoType(structField.dataType)))
Review Comment:
ok let me fix the nullability in this PR then. Maybe it is a right time now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org