You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Astamur Kirillin (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/11/28 09:29:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-30224) NullPointerException in FlinkKinesisConsumer's close() method during too early stop-with-savepoint

Astamur Kirillin created FLINK-30224:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: NullPointerException in FlinkKinesisConsumer's close() method during too early stop-with-savepoint
                 Key: FLINK-30224
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30224
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Connectors / Kinesis
    Affects Versions: 1.15.2
            Reporter: Astamur Kirillin


In our project we observed an issue during too early call of `stop-with-savepoint ` operation when we're calling it after 4-6 seconds after a job was started.

We use Kinesis EFO consumer in our application and it looks like that it takes some time for the `KinesisDataFetcher` to be initialized and because of that `FlinkKinesisConsumer#run(SourceContext<T>)` method is slow. In some tests we call `stop-with-savepoint` after 4-6 seconds after a job was started and we have `NullPointerException` in `FlinkKinesisConsumer#close()`:
```
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.FlinkKinesisConsumer.close(FlinkKinesisConsumer.java:421) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.api.common.functions.util.FunctionUtils.closeFunction(FunctionUtils.java:41) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.AbstractUdfStreamOperator.close(AbstractUdfStreamOperator.java:114) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.StreamSource.close(StreamSource.java:124) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamOperatorWrapper.close(StreamOperatorWrapper.java:163) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.RegularOperatorChain.closeAllOperators(RegularOperatorChain.java:125) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.closeAllOperators(StreamTask.java:997) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.afterInvoke(StreamTask.java:876) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:759) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.runWithSystemExitMonitoring(Task.java:953) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.restoreAndInvoke(Task.java:932) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.doRun(Task.java:746) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:568) ~[classes/:?]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829) ~[?:?]
```

 

We were able to reproduce this issue in `FlinkKinesisITCase` even for a standard KDS consumer. A fix is just an additional non-null check during consumer's close. We'll also add an IT-test for that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)