You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2009/05/11 10:10:17 UTC

Cms Site not working

Hi,

Cms Site is not working with last revision. 
I tried also using the revision where CMSS_DEMO_TPL_DATA and related were introduced (r766217) but it does not work either. 
There seems to be an Infinite Recursion problem. Was this feature working when it was introduced ?

Thanks

Jacques




Re: Cms Site not working

Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Simply clic on the secondary application Cms Site to reproduce the issue.
If you remove this line
<div><a href="${thisContent.content.CMSS_DEMO_TPL_DATA.link}">Demo Page with an xml resource formatted with a template ftl 
resource</a></div>
in  CmsSiteDemoData.xml, it works again

Jacques

From: "David E Jones" <da...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>
> Could you be more specific, perhaps with the URL you tried?
>
> In general I'd say yes, it was originally working, though I'm not sure  what that means or how that matters.
>
> -David
>
>
> On May 11, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Cms Site is not working with last revision. I tried also using the  revision where CMSS_DEMO_TPL_DATA and related were introduced 
>> (r766217) but it does not work either. There seems to be an Infinite  Recursion problem. Was this feature working when it was 
>> introduced ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
> 



Re: Cms Site not working

Posted by David E Jones <da...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Could you be more specific, perhaps with the URL you tried?

In general I'd say yes, it was originally working, though I'm not sure  
what that means or how that matters.

-David


On May 11, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Cms Site is not working with last revision. I tried also using the  
> revision where CMSS_DEMO_TPL_DATA and related were introduced  
> (r766217) but it does not work either. There seems to be an Infinite  
> Recursion problem. Was this feature working when it was introduced ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
>