You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2009/05/11 10:10:17 UTC
Cms Site not working
Hi,
Cms Site is not working with last revision.
I tried also using the revision where CMSS_DEMO_TPL_DATA and related were introduced (r766217) but it does not work either.
There seems to be an Infinite Recursion problem. Was this feature working when it was introduced ?
Thanks
Jacques
Re: Cms Site not working
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Simply clic on the secondary application Cms Site to reproduce the issue.
If you remove this line
<div><a href="${thisContent.content.CMSS_DEMO_TPL_DATA.link}">Demo Page with an xml resource formatted with a template ftl
resource</a></div>
in CmsSiteDemoData.xml, it works again
Jacques
From: "David E Jones" <da...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>
> Could you be more specific, perhaps with the URL you tried?
>
> In general I'd say yes, it was originally working, though I'm not sure what that means or how that matters.
>
> -David
>
>
> On May 11, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Cms Site is not working with last revision. I tried also using the revision where CMSS_DEMO_TPL_DATA and related were introduced
>> (r766217) but it does not work either. There seems to be an Infinite Recursion problem. Was this feature working when it was
>> introduced ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Cms Site not working
Posted by David E Jones <da...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Could you be more specific, perhaps with the URL you tried?
In general I'd say yes, it was originally working, though I'm not sure
what that means or how that matters.
-David
On May 11, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cms Site is not working with last revision. I tried also using the
> revision where CMSS_DEMO_TPL_DATA and related were introduced
> (r766217) but it does not work either. There seems to be an Infinite
> Recursion problem. Was this feature working when it was introduced ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
>