You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/07 17:33:45 UTC
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.plugins.PluginAttribute.sensitive()
I find the name sensitive() confusing, I through it dealt with case
sensitivity until I read the Javadoc.
How about secret()?
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.plugins.PluginAttribute.sensitive()
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
Or even hideInLogs
On 8 July 2014 09:27, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about "hide"?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Remko Popma <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What about "masked" or "shouldBeMasked"?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2014/07/08, at 7:58, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well, it's more like an "isPassword" boolean, really. Like, should this
>> attribute be masked or hashed or similar in log messages.
>>
>>
>> On 7 July 2014 10:33, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I find the name sensitive() confusing, I through it dealt with case
>>> sensitivity until I read the Javadoc.
>>>
>>> How about secret()?
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.plugins.PluginAttribute.sensitive()
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
What about "hide"?
Gary
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Remko Popma <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about "masked" or "shouldBeMasked"?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2014/07/08, at 7:58, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it's more like an "isPassword" boolean, really. Like, should this
> attribute be masked or hashed or similar in log messages.
>
>
> On 7 July 2014 10:33, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I find the name sensitive() confusing, I through it dealt with case
>> sensitivity until I read the Javadoc.
>>
>> How about secret()?
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.plugins.PluginAttribute.sensitive()
Posted by Remko Popma <re...@gmail.com>.
What about "masked" or "shouldBeMasked"?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2014/07/08, at 7:58, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it's more like an "isPassword" boolean, really. Like, should this attribute be masked or hashed or similar in log messages.
>
>
>> On 7 July 2014 10:33, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I find the name sensitive() confusing, I through it dealt with case sensitivity until I read the Javadoc.
>>
>> How about secret()?
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>> Spring Batch in Action
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.plugins.PluginAttribute.sensitive()
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
Well, it's more like an "isPassword" boolean, really. Like, should this
attribute be masked or hashed or similar in log messages.
On 7 July 2014 10:33, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I find the name sensitive() confusing, I through it dealt with case
> sensitivity until I read the Javadoc.
>
> How about secret()?
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>