You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org> on 2010/11/21 23:13:04 UTC

2.2 -> current

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/conf/httpd.conf.in


"s|http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/|http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/|g" **/*.in  

Does this make sense, or will it be a nuisance when we promote 2.3 stable?

i

-- 
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: 2.2 -> current

Posted by Dan Poirier <po...@pobox.com>.
It's probably better to leave it.  2.2 will be in use for a long time
after 2.4 is released and the new doc won't apply to it.

2010/11/21 Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/conf/httpd.conf.in
>
>
> "s|http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/|http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/|g" **/*.in
>
> Does this make sense, or will it be a nuisance when we promote 2.3 stable?

-- 
Dan Poirier
<po...@pobox.com>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: 2.2 -> current

Posted by Sander Temme <sc...@apache.org>.
On Nov 21, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Igor Galić wrote:

> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/conf/httpd.conf.in
> 
> 
> "s|http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/|http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/|g" **/*.in  
> 
> Does this make sense, or will it be a nuisance when we promote 2.3 stable?

Wha?  AAUI, the 2.2.x docs document the 2.2.x releases, and this will not change as we make new branches.  If any docs that apply to 2.2.x are only in the trunk docs, then they need to be backported.  Don't we even have a lightweight process for that? 

Or am I understanding you incorrectly? 

S.

-- 
Sander Temme
sctemme@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007  EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A

View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org