You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Michael Scheidell <mi...@secnap.com> on 2010/12/07 16:52:25 UTC

Re: was and is 'AskDns.pm' on 3.3. FW: Spamhaus Whitelist

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Scheidell
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 2:59 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Spamhaus Whitelist
>

found out that below is a violation of the specs, and is NOT recommended 
to be used.
I would assume that the specs detail tighter control over the signing 
domain, rather than just the envelope sender.

>> urirhsbl SPAMHAUS_DWL _vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org. A
>> body     SPAMHAUS_DWL eval:check_uridnsbl('SPAMHAUS_DWL')
>> describe SPAMHAUS_DWL Domain is whitelisted by Spamhaus
>> tflags   SPAMHAUS_DWL net nice
>> score    SPAMHAUS_DWL -2.5
>>
>> Set the scores to your own liking.
>>
>> Bill
>

-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

    * Certified SNORT Integrator
    * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
    * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
    * Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
    * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). 
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________