You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "ant elder (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/16 10:41:51 UTC
[jira] [Created] (LEGAL-178) Location of LICENSE/NOTICE files in
binary release artifacts
ant elder created LEGAL-178:
-------------------------------
Summary: Location of LICENSE/NOTICE files in binary release artifacts
Key: LEGAL-178
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-178
Project: Legal Discuss
Issue Type: Question
Reporter: ant elder
Over at the Incubator a question has come up over where the LICENSE and NOTICE files should be located in binary release artifacts. I can't find any precise or accurate documentation on this so could that be defined here?
The web page http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice says:
"Every Apache distribution should include a NOTICE file in the top directory, along with the standard LICENSE file."
However things like Java .jar artifacts don't do that and instead have them located in the /META-INF directory. Related to that, what about things like Windows .msi or .exe insaller packages which don't have a "top directory"?
I vaguely remember this question coming up before but i can't find anything in the archives now, FWIR the answer then was it was ok for the LICENSE/NOTICE to be located where ever was most appropriate and expected for the environment and binary artifact type.
Any comments?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org