You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> on 2017/05/08 20:48:39 UTC
First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the acceptance
criteria document [2].
Please consider contributing to this effort by:
* proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
* supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
* validating a criteria.
Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or too broad
-- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had earlier. This
should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple, surface-level things.
If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
* file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
* post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that specific release
candidate.
Thanks!
Davor
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[2]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGygYRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>.
Thanks for contributing here!
We've ended up with 11 criteria, validated by many folks over 4 release
candidates, and fixing important bugs in each release candidate. This
really made a difference -- thanks so much!
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Chamikara Jayalath <
chamikara@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> Validated same examples Vikas mentioned for Windows. Updated the doc on
> acceptance criteria.
>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:43 PM Vikas RK <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just validated wordcount and mobile gaming examples for Python SDK on
> > Direct and Dataflow runner. Mostly looks good to me, with minor changes
> > that could be done to improve user experience, but not a blocker for FSR.
> > (filed BEAM-2286 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2286>)
> >
> > On 12 May 2017 at 07:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Enjoy Kenn !
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > >
> > > On 05/12/2017 03:38 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > >
> > >> I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping
> > >> starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with
> me
> > >> on
> > >> it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might
> > not
> > >> see any more action. I have a lot of faith in this community to
> validate
> > >> the release.
> > >>
> > >> See you Monday!
> > >>
> > >> Kenn
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <
> > >> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> on Spark, doh
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <
> jasonkuster@google.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster
> > successfully.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles
> > <klk@google.com.invalid
> > >>>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
> > >>>>> configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to
> > do
> > >>>>> with
> > >>>>> my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> experts
> > >>>
> > >>>> try these on their more realistic setups.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh
> > <tgroh@google.com.invalid
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of
> > scenarios
> > >>>>>> (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of
> hours
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>
> > >>>> still going strong in streaming)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> <dhalperi@google.com.invalid
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'm focusing on:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
> > >>>>>>> * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies,
> > etc.)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> <lcwik@google.com.invalid
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> > >>>>>>>> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> davor@apache.org>
> > >>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> here.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> aljoscha@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this document!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> acceptance
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> criteria document [2].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> * validating a criteria.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> deep or
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> too
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> broad
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> had
> > >>>
> > >>>> earlier.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> This
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> surface-level
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> things.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> If you discover issues while validating a criteria,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> please:
> > >>>
> > >>>> * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> specific
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Davor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> -------
> > >>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
> > >>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> -------
> > >>>> Jason Kuster
> > >>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> -------
> > >>> Jason Kuster
> > >>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > jbonofre@apache.org
> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >
> >
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com.INVALID>.
Validated same examples Vikas mentioned for Windows. Updated the doc on
acceptance criteria.
Thanks,
Cham
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:43 PM Vikas RK <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just validated wordcount and mobile gaming examples for Python SDK on
> Direct and Dataflow runner. Mostly looks good to me, with minor changes
> that could be done to improve user experience, but not a blocker for FSR.
> (filed BEAM-2286 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2286>)
>
> On 12 May 2017 at 07:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> > Enjoy Kenn !
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 05/12/2017 03:38 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> >
> >> I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping
> >> starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with me
> >> on
> >> it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might
> not
> >> see any more action. I have a lot of faith in this community to validate
> >> the release.
> >>
> >> See you Monday!
> >>
> >> Kenn
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <
> >> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> on Spark, doh
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster
> successfully.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles
> <klk@google.com.invalid
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
> >>>>> configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to
> do
> >>>>> with
> >>>>> my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system
> >>>>>
> >>>> experts
> >>>
> >>>> try these on their more realistic setups.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh
> <tgroh@google.com.invalid
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of
> scenarios
> >>>>>> (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> and
> >>>
> >>>> still going strong in streaming)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> <dhalperi@google.com.invalid
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm focusing on:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
> >>>>>>> * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies,
> etc.)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> <lcwik@google.com.invalid
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> >>>>>>>> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> davor@apache.org>
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> aljoscha@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this document!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> acceptance
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> criteria document [2].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * validating a criteria.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> deep or
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> broad
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> had
> >>>
> >>>> earlier.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> surface-level
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> things.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you discover issues while validating a criteria,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> please:
> >>>
> >>>> * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> specific
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Davor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> -------
> >>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> -------
> >>>> Jason Kuster
> >>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -------
> >>> Jason Kuster
> >>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Vikas RK <vi...@gmail.com>.
Just validated wordcount and mobile gaming examples for Python SDK on
Direct and Dataflow runner. Mostly looks good to me, with minor changes
that could be done to improve user experience, but not a blocker for FSR.
(filed BEAM-2286 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2286>)
On 12 May 2017 at 07:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Enjoy Kenn !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/12/2017 03:38 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>
>> I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping
>> starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with me
>> on
>> it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might not
>> see any more action. I have a lot of faith in this community to validate
>> the release.
>>
>> See you Monday!
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <
>> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> on Spark, doh
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles <klk@google.com.invalid
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
>>>>> configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do
>>>>> with
>>>>> my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system
>>>>>
>>>> experts
>>>
>>>> try these on their more realistic setups.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tgroh@google.com.invalid
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
>>>>>> (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours
>>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>
>>>> still going strong in streaming)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
>>>>>>
>>>>> <dhalperi@google.com.invalid
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm focusing on:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
>>>>>>> * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> <lcwik@google.com.invalid
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
>>>>>>>> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> davor@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> aljoscha@apache.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this document!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>>> acceptance
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> criteria document [2].
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please consider contributing to this effort by:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
>>>>>>>>>>>> * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
>>>>>>>>>>>> * validating a criteria.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> deep or
>>>>>
>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> broad
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> had
>>>
>>>> earlier.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> surface-level
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> things.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you discover issues while validating a criteria,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> please:
>>>
>>>> * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>> * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Davor
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -------
>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------
>>> Jason Kuster
>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Enjoy Kenn !
Regards
JB
On 05/12/2017 03:38 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping
> starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with me on
> it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might not
> see any more action. I have a lot of faith in this community to validate
> the release.
>
> See you Monday!
>
> Kenn
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <
> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> on Spark, doh
>>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles <klk@google.com.invalid
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
>>>> configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
>>>>
>>>> There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do
>>>> with
>>>> my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system
>> experts
>>>> try these on their more realistic setups.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
>>>>> (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours
>> and
>>>>> still going strong in streaming)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
>>>> <dhalperi@google.com.invalid
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm focusing on:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
>>>>>> * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik
>> <lcwik@google.com.invalid
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
>>>>>>> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <
>> davor@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing
>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>>>>>> aljoscha@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this document!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> acceptance
>>>>>>>>>>> criteria document [2].
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please consider contributing to this effort by:
>>>>>>>>>>> * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
>>>>>>>>>>> * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
>>>>>>>>>>> * validating a criteria.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too
>>>> deep or
>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>> broad
>>>>>>>>>>> -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we
>> had
>>>>>>> earlier.
>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>> should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
>>>>> surface-level
>>>>>>>>> things.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you discover issues while validating a criteria,
>> please:
>>>>>>>>>>> * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”,
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Davor
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
>>>>>>> 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
>>>>>>>>>> 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/
>>>>>> 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
>>>>>>>>>> YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------
>>> Jason Kuster
>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -------
>> Jason Kuster
>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com.INVALID>.
I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping
starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with me on
it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might not
see any more action. I have a lot of faith in this community to validate
the release.
See you Monday!
Kenn
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <
jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> on Spark, doh
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully.
> >
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles <klk@google.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
> >> configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
> >>
> >> There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do
> >> with
> >> my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system
> experts
> >> try these on their more realistic setups.
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.invalid>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
> >> > (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours
> and
> >> > still going strong in streaming)
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
> >> <dhalperi@google.com.invalid
> >> > >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I'm focusing on:
> >> > >
> >> > > * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
> >> > > * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> <lcwik@google.com.invalid
> >> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> >> > > > jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <
> davor@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing
> >> here.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> >> > > aljoscha@apache.org>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks for starting this document!
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > > > Aljoscha
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
> >> the
> >> > > > > > acceptance
> >> > > > > > > > criteria document [2].
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> >> > > > > > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> >> > > > > > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> >> > > > > > > > * validating a criteria.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too
> >> deep or
> >> > > too
> >> > > > > > broad
> >> > > > > > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we
> had
> >> > > > earlier.
> >> > > > > > > This
> >> > > > > > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
> >> > surface-level
> >> > > > > > things.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria,
> please:
> >> > > > > > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”,
> >> and
> >> > > > > > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
> >> > > specific
> >> > > > > > > release
> >> > > > > > > > candidate.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Davor
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > [1]
> >> > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> >> > > > 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> >> > > > > > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >> > > > > > > > [2]
> >> > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> >> > > 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> >> > > > > > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > -------
> >> > > > > Jason Kuster
> >> > > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -------
> > Jason Kuster
> > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -------
> Jason Kuster
> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com.INVALID>.
on Spark, doh
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
wrote:
> Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully.
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
>> configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
>>
>> There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do
>> with
>> my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system experts
>> try these on their more realistic setups.
>>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
>> > (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours and
>> > still going strong in streaming)
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
>> <dhalperi@google.com.invalid
>> > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I'm focusing on:
>> > >
>> > > * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
>> > > * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com.invalid
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
>> > > > jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing
>> here.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>> > > aljoscha@apache.org>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks for starting this document!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > Aljoscha
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
>> the
>> > > > > > acceptance
>> > > > > > > > criteria document [2].
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
>> > > > > > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
>> > > > > > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
>> > > > > > > > * validating a criteria.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too
>> deep or
>> > > too
>> > > > > > broad
>> > > > > > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had
>> > > > earlier.
>> > > > > > > This
>> > > > > > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
>> > surface-level
>> > > > > > things.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
>> > > > > > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”,
>> and
>> > > > > > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
>> > > specific
>> > > > > > > release
>> > > > > > > > candidate.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Davor
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [1]
>> > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
>> > > > 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
>> > > > > > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> > > > > > > > [2]
>> > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/
>> > > 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
>> > > > > > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > -------
>> > > > > Jason Kuster
>> > > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -------
> Jason Kuster
> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>
--
-------
Jason Kuster
Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com.INVALID>.
Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
> configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
>
> There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do with
> my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system experts
> try these on their more realistic setups.
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
> > (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours and
> > still going strong in streaming)
> >
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
> <dhalperi@google.com.invalid
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm focusing on:
> > >
> > > * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
> > > * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com.invalid
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> > > > jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> > > aljoscha@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for starting this document!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Aljoscha
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
> the
> > > > > > acceptance
> > > > > > > > criteria document [2].
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > > > > > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > > > > > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > > > > > > > * validating a criteria.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep
> or
> > > too
> > > > > > broad
> > > > > > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had
> > > > earlier.
> > > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
> > surface-level
> > > > > > things.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> > > > > > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> > > > > > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
> > > specific
> > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > candidate.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Davor
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > > > 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> > > > > > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> > > 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> > > > > > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -------
> > > > > Jason Kuster
> > > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
-------
Jason Kuster
Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com.INVALID>.
I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do with
my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system experts
try these on their more realistic setups.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
> (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours and
> still going strong in streaming)
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin <dhalperi@google.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I'm focusing on:
> >
> > * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
> > * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
> >
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> > > jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here.
> > > > >
> > > > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> > aljoscha@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for starting this document!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Aljoscha
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the
> > > > > acceptance
> > > > > > > criteria document [2].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > > > > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > > > > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > > > > > > * validating a criteria.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or
> > too
> > > > > broad
> > > > > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had
> > > earlier.
> > > > > > This
> > > > > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
> surface-level
> > > > > things.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> > > > > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> > > > > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
> > specific
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > candidate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Davor
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > > 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> > > > > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> > 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> > > > > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -------
> > > > Jason Kuster
> > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.INVALID>.
I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
(primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours and
still going strong in streaming)
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I'm focusing on:
>
> * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
> * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
> >
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> > jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here.
> > > >
> > > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> aljoscha@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for starting this document!
> > > > >
> > > > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Aljoscha
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the
> > > > acceptance
> > > > > > criteria document [2].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > > > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > > > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > > > > > * validating a criteria.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or
> too
> > > > broad
> > > > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had
> > earlier.
> > > > > This
> > > > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple, surface-level
> > > > things.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> > > > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> > > > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
> specific
> > > > > release
> > > > > > candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Davor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> > > > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> > > > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -------
> > > Jason Kuster
> > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> > >
> >
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID>.
I'm focusing on:
* user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
* the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here.
> > >
> > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for starting this document!
> > > >
> > > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Aljoscha
> > > >
> > > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the
> > > acceptance
> > > > > criteria document [2].
> > > > >
> > > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > > > > * validating a criteria.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or too
> > > broad
> > > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had
> earlier.
> > > > This
> > > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple, surface-level
> > > things.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> > > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> > > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that specific
> > > > release
> > > > > candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Davor
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> > > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > > > [2]
> > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> > > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -------
> > Jason Kuster
> > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com.INVALID>.
I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
jasonkuster@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here.
> >
> > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> >
> > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for starting this document!
> > >
> > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Aljoscha
> > >
> > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the
> > acceptance
> > > > criteria document [2].
> > > >
> > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > > > * validating a criteria.
> > > >
> > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or too
> > broad
> > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had earlier.
> > > This
> > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple, surface-level
> > things.
> > > >
> > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that specific
> > > release
> > > > candidate.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Davor
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > > [2]
> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -------
> Jason Kuster
> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com.INVALID>.
I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here.
>
> We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for starting this document!
> >
> > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> >
> > Best,
> > Aljoscha
> >
> > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the
> acceptance
> > > criteria document [2].
> > >
> > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > > * validating a criteria.
> > >
> > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or too
> broad
> > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had earlier.
> > This
> > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple, surface-level
> things.
> > >
> > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that specific
> > release
> > > candidate.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Davor
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > [2]
> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> >
> >
>
--
-------
Jason Kuster
Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>.
Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here.
We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Thanks for starting this document!
>
> I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
>
> Best,
> Aljoscha
>
> > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the acceptance
> > criteria document [2].
> >
> > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > * validating a criteria.
> >
> > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or too broad
> > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had earlier.
> This
> > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple, surface-level things.
> >
> > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that specific
> release
> > candidate.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Davor
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > [2]
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
>
>
Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
Thanks for starting this document!
I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
Best,
Aljoscha
> On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the acceptance
> criteria document [2].
>
> Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> * validating a criteria.
>
> Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or too broad
> -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had earlier. This
> should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple, surface-level things.
>
> If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that specific release
> candidate.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Davor
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGygYRj2lrNrqmAUvo/