You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to distributedlog-dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> on 2017/01/05 00:53:54 UTC
Re: [DISCUSSION] First Release
FYI. I merged the repackage script and repackage the namespace under
org.apache.distributedlog. All the changes for 0.4.0 are merged (except one
test case change - waiting for Liang's response). Ready to cut the first
release candidate.
- Sijie
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've merged all the pull requests that need to be included in 0.4.0 (and
> both Jenkins and CI builds are green now). Also I moved inactive jiras to
> 0.5.0.
>
> There are a few issues remaining - https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DL%20AND%20resolution%20%
> 3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%
> 20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
> Most of them already have pull requests (but need to be rebased to latest
> master). So I can merge them.
>
> Hopefully I will be able to cut 0.4.0 release in following few days.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I will start check the jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0 release at
>> the weekend. If there is any jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0,
>> please comment in the jira.
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking
>>> building the process.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the dists
>>> for DL.
>>>
>>> - Sijie
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this
>>>> version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki.
>>>>
>>>> I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure:
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Pr
>>>> eparing+DistributedLog+Releases
>>>>
>>>> - Sijie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking
>>>>> forward to
>>>>> see bookkeeper 4.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -Flavio
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Flavio,
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache version is not
>>>>> great
>>>>> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've
>>>>> discussed
>>>>> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment
>>>>> to
>>>>> > merge
>>>>> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't
>>>>> maintain
>>>>> > our
>>>>> > > own branch and switch to 4.5.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Hope this make sense.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Sijie
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache
>>>>> BookKeeper
>>>>> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to
>>>>> use the
>>>>> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache
>>>>> BookKeeper.
>>>>> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd
>>>>> be more
>>>>> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases,
>>>>> which
>>>>> > are
>>>>> > > community driven.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is
>>>>> important
>>>>> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to
>>>>> fix
>>>>> > DL-2.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > -Flavio
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart
>>>>> <ls...@twitter.com.INVALID>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> +1
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <
>>>>> franck.cuny@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23.
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>> - Xi
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
>>>>> > khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
>>>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating.
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> - kn
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release.
>>>>> There are
>>>>> > >>>>> still a
>>>>> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we
>>>>> need to
>>>>> > >>> pick
>>>>> > >>>>> up a
>>>>> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from
>>>>> there.
>>>>> > Here
>>>>> > >>>> is
>>>>> > >>>>> a
>>>>> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include:
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>:
>>>>> Repackaging
>>>>> > >>>>> namespace
>>>>> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing)
>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>:
>>>>> support
>>>>> > scala
>>>>> > >>>>> 2.10
>>>>> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged)
>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move
>>>>> DL to
>>>>> > >>>> depend
>>>>> > >>>>>> on
>>>>> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift
>>>>> version,
>>>>> > >>>>> which
>>>>> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull
>>>>> request out.
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2
>>>>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the
>>>>> official
>>>>> > >>>>>> bookkeeper
>>>>> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new
>>>>> release
>>>>> > >>>> once
>>>>> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure
>>>>> between
>>>>> > DL
>>>>> > >>>> and
>>>>> > >>>>>> BK.
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should
>>>>> be
>>>>> > >>>> included
>>>>> > >>>>> in
>>>>> > >>>>>> the first release.
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager
>>>>> for
>>>>> > >>> first
>>>>> > >>>>>> release?
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>> - Sijie
>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> --
>>>>> > >>> -franck
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] First Release
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>.
cool! Thank you so much for rebasing this.
- Sijie
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:20 PM, liang xie <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The conflicted DL-167 change has been rebased, please help to review :)
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > FYI. I merged the repackage script and repackage the namespace under
> > org.apache.distributedlog. All the changes for 0.4.0 are merged (except
> one
> > test case change - waiting for Liang's response). Ready to cut the first
> > release candidate.
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I've merged all the pull requests that need to be included in 0.4.0 (and
> >> both Jenkins and CI builds are green now). Also I moved inactive jiras
> to
> >> 0.5.0.
> >>
> >> There are a few issues remaining - https://issues.apache.org/
> >> jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DL%20AND%20resolution%20%
> >> 3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%
> >> 20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >>
> >> Most of them already have pull requests (but need to be rebased to
> latest
> >> master). So I can merge them.
> >>
> >> Hopefully I will be able to cut 0.4.0 release in following few days.
> >>
> >> - Sijie
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I will start check the jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0 release
> at
> >>> the weekend. If there is any jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0,
> >>> please comment in the jira.
> >>>
> >>> - Sijie
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> FYI.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking
> >>>> building the process.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the
> dists
> >>>> for DL.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Sijie
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this
> >>>>> version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the
> wiki.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure:
> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Pr
> >>>>> eparing+DistributedLog+Releases
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Sijie
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking
> >>>>>> forward to
> >>>>>> see bookkeeper 4.5.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > -Flavio
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > Flavio,
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache version is
> not
> >>>>>> great
> >>>>>> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've
> >>>>>> discussed
> >>>>>> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a
> commitment
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> > merge
> >>>>>> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't
> >>>>>> maintain
> >>>>>> > our
> >>>>>> > > own branch and switch to 4.5.
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > Hope this make sense.
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > Sijie
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache
> >>>>>> BookKeeper
> >>>>>> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to
> >>>>>> use the
> >>>>>> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache
> >>>>>> BookKeeper.
> >>>>>> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but
> I'd
> >>>>>> be more
> >>>>>> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper
> releases,
> >>>>>> which
> >>>>>> > are
> >>>>>> > > community driven.
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is
> >>>>>> important
> >>>>>> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to
> >>>>>> fix
> >>>>>> > DL-2.
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > -Flavio
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart
> >>>>>> <ls...@twitter.com.INVALID>
> >>>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>> > >> +1
> >>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <
> >>>>>> franck.cuny@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>>> > >>
> >>>>>> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker.
> >>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu.ant@gmail.com
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23.
> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>> - Xi
> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
> >>>>>> > khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> > >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>> > >>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating.
> >>>>>> > >>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>> - kn
> >>>>>> > >>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <
> sijie@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> > >>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release.
> >>>>>> There are
> >>>>>> > >>>>> still a
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we
> >>>>>> need to
> >>>>>> > >>> pick
> >>>>>> > >>>>> up a
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from
> >>>>>> there.
> >>>>>> > Here
> >>>>>> > >>>> is
> >>>>>> > >>>>> a
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include:
> >>>>>> > >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>:
> >>>>>> Repackaging
> >>>>>> > >>>>> namespace
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing)
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>:
> >>>>>> support
> >>>>>> > scala
> >>>>>> > >>>>> 2.10
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged)
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>:
> Move
> >>>>>> DL to
> >>>>>> > >>>> depend
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> on
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift
> >>>>>> version,
> >>>>>> > >>>>> which
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull
> >>>>>> request out.
> >>>>>> > >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the
> >>>>>> official
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> bookkeeper
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a
> new
> >>>>>> release
> >>>>>> > >>>> once
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure
> >>>>>> between
> >>>>>> > DL
> >>>>>> > >>>> and
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> BK.
> >>>>>> > >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it
> should
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>> > >>>> included
> >>>>>> > >>>>> in
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> the first release.
> >>>>>> > >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release
> manager
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>> > >>> first
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> release?
> >>>>>> > >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Sijie
> >>>>>> > >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>> > >>> --
> >>>>>> > >>> -franck
> >>>>>> > >>>
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] First Release
Posted by liang xie <xi...@gmail.com>.
The conflicted DL-167 change has been rebased, please help to review :)
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> FYI. I merged the repackage script and repackage the namespace under
> org.apache.distributedlog. All the changes for 0.4.0 are merged (except one
> test case change - waiting for Liang's response). Ready to cut the first
> release candidate.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I've merged all the pull requests that need to be included in 0.4.0 (and
>> both Jenkins and CI builds are green now). Also I moved inactive jiras to
>> 0.5.0.
>>
>> There are a few issues remaining - https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DL%20AND%20resolution%20%
>> 3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%
>> 20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>
>> Most of them already have pull requests (but need to be rebased to latest
>> master). So I can merge them.
>>
>> Hopefully I will be able to cut 0.4.0 release in following few days.
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I will start check the jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0 release at
>>> the weekend. If there is any jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0,
>>> please comment in the jira.
>>>
>>> - Sijie
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> FYI.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking
>>>> building the process.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the dists
>>>> for DL.
>>>>
>>>> - Sijie
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this
>>>>> version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure:
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Pr
>>>>> eparing+DistributedLog+Releases
>>>>>
>>>>> - Sijie
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking
>>>>>> forward to
>>>>>> see bookkeeper 4.5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -Flavio
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Flavio,
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache version is not
>>>>>> great
>>>>>> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've
>>>>>> discussed
>>>>>> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> > merge
>>>>>> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't
>>>>>> maintain
>>>>>> > our
>>>>>> > > own branch and switch to 4.5.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Hope this make sense.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Sijie
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache
>>>>>> BookKeeper
>>>>>> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to
>>>>>> use the
>>>>>> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache
>>>>>> BookKeeper.
>>>>>> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd
>>>>>> be more
>>>>>> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases,
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> > are
>>>>>> > > community driven.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is
>>>>>> important
>>>>>> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to
>>>>>> fix
>>>>>> > DL-2.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > -Flavio
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart
>>>>>> <ls...@twitter.com.INVALID>
>>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>> > >> +1
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <
>>>>>> franck.cuny@gmail.com>
>>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23.
>>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>>> > >>>> - Xi
>>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
>>>>>> > khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
>>>>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating.
>>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>> - kn
>>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release.
>>>>>> There are
>>>>>> > >>>>> still a
>>>>>> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we
>>>>>> need to
>>>>>> > >>> pick
>>>>>> > >>>>> up a
>>>>>> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from
>>>>>> there.
>>>>>> > Here
>>>>>> > >>>> is
>>>>>> > >>>>> a
>>>>>> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include:
>>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>:
>>>>>> Repackaging
>>>>>> > >>>>> namespace
>>>>>> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing)
>>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>:
>>>>>> support
>>>>>> > scala
>>>>>> > >>>>> 2.10
>>>>>> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged)
>>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move
>>>>>> DL to
>>>>>> > >>>> depend
>>>>>> > >>>>>> on
>>>>>> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift
>>>>>> version,
>>>>>> > >>>>> which
>>>>>> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull
>>>>>> request out.
>>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2
>>>>>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the
>>>>>> official
>>>>>> > >>>>>> bookkeeper
>>>>>> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> > >>>> once
>>>>>> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure
>>>>>> between
>>>>>> > DL
>>>>>> > >>>> and
>>>>>> > >>>>>> BK.
>>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> > >>>> included
>>>>>> > >>>>> in
>>>>>> > >>>>>> the first release.
>>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> > >>> first
>>>>>> > >>>>>> release?
>>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>>> - Sijie
>>>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>>
>>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> --
>>>>>> > >>> -franck
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>